Roy's Journal

Hi Roy,

I understand you are winding down your participation in the forum, but I leave you this message as some food for thought, particularly as it relates to details of the spiritual journey I went through.

There are no fundamental clarity of language issues that I can see here. There may be one or two instances where you meant one thing and your follow-up clarified, and that’s the end of it. The disagreements here are related to the substance of what’s being discussed, not the words being used to discuss it!

I can relate to what you say about constant negative thoughts of worrying because I used to have constant negative anxious thoughts, day in and day out, for hours and sometimes days at a time of constantly feeling it.

I will put it like this. When I was meditating and on a spiritual journey, thoughts were really a problem. Constant thoughts, bothersome thoughts. Thoughts all the time. And also I had the same self-report at the start of my journey that meditation helped with it! But interestingly they bothered me more and more the more I meditated! Why couldn’t I just quiet my monkey mind? I was able to have long periods without thoughts, especially with closed-eye meditation, but ‘they’ kept cropping up, throughout daily life. I was very concerned about stopping these negative thoughts!!

Once I genuinely started down the actualist path, I almost immediately completely stopped being bothered by thoughts! I’m not making this up, this was my actual experience near the start of practically putting actualism into practice.

How is it possible? The key insight was this: I saw that it was not actually the thoughts that were ever bothering me in the first place! What was actually the problem was the feeling underlying the thoughts.

I used to be extremely anxious, like going entire days with a constant feeling of anxiety. Meditation didn’t help lessen it, and I was attempting to use meditation to quiet the anxious thoughts, with the idea that once the anxious thoughts are gone I would be ok/at peace. But I came to see that the problem wasn’t the anxious/negative thought per se, but rather the feeling of anxiety that was running as an undercurrent, ‘behind’ the thoughts.

I came to see, for example, that when I was feeling anxious, I had a lot of anxious and ‘bothersome’ thoughts about topics A, B, and C. But when I was in a good mood, I did not have these anxious thoughts. I could even think essentially the exact same things about A, B, and C… but they were not bothersome thoughts anymore!

In other words the problem never was the negative thoughts, it was the negative emotions and feelings and worry underlying the thought. This allowed me to actually do something about the actual problem – the negative emotions – which thereby also resolved ‘for free’ the problem of the negative thoughts. It didn’t happen instantly but gradually my situation started to improve, whereas the more I had been meditating, the worse it got.

I appreciate your actually doing it for yourself to see what it’s about. I would just advise that you do this with the actualism method instead of with meditation, as the former will have a better impact on your life.

I’ll say this: the only reason I was able to move away from spirituality and meditation to actualism is because actualism was a better alternative. In other words, you are currently finding mindfulness meditation to be helpful – it doesn’t make sense for you to stop unless you replace it with something even better than that. I write this message with the intent that you can see for yourself how you can do this – it won’t even be a big change practically.

Mais non, look, I started with the book 8 Minute Meditation, which is particularly a book on mindfulness mediation. As one reviewer put it:

Even though I have numerous books on meditation I found this 195 paperback volume surprisingly refreshing, interesting and informative. Where most books on meditation recommend doing two 20-minute sessions as a minimum, the author, in order to bring more people into the practice of mindfulness meditation promotes just 8 minute sessions at a starting point.

The techniques I was using were all forms of Vipassana meditation, which is a form of mindfulness meditation, viz.:

Vipassana meditation is a form of mindfulness meditation that comes from the original teachings of the Buddha. It is a way of observing oneself without judgment, and it is said to be helpful in achieving enlightenment.
What Is Vipassana Meditation? Benefits and History

You gave some more detail of what you are calling mindfulness meditation:

Yes, exactly, that is how it starts. That’s the instructions of the 8-minute meditation. And that is the purpose of Vipassana meditation – to just ‘observe’ things ‘as they are’.

However there are many sneaky premises buried in these superficially neutral instructions. One is that you must not ‘judge’ any of it. Another is you must not ‘do’ anything about it – just observe. This already is serving to separate you from what you are experiencing. The normal way to be is to engage with the world around us – this is teaching you gradually to distance yourself from the world. And not only the world (‘senses’) but also from yourself, from your own thoughts & feelings!

If you take this to heart then later you see that part of the point of the meditation is also to see that anything you are perceiving can’t be “you” because it must be that you are the person that is perceiving that. But then who is doing the perceiving of that? If you seek more information you will see that intrinsic to this type of meditation is to “see” that there is actually no ‘self’ at all, all that can be experienced is a series of sensations. And as the sensations are impermanent, they arise and they disappear, then therefore they cannot be lasting or ultimately satisfying. So you then subtly shift and go into the direction that nothing in the world is satisfying and there is no self anyway, and off you go into further and further Altered States of Consciousness.

I am concerned because this is what happened to me, and if it can happen to me it can easily happen to you. I put it here so you are forewarned if and when you see yourself starting to go down this path.

It’s even simpler than you write here. If you are having a repetitive negative train of thought nearly 100% of the time, then that is your answer to the question of how you’re experiencing this moment of being alive – with a negative train of thought! That is the answer to the question for you in that moment.

I will say that the cause of the negative trains of thought is not a lack of attention, of being able to concentrate or focus. The cause of the negative trains of thought is negative feelings, moods, and emotions. There are things in your life that cause you stress, worry, and anxiety. The solution to the negative thoughts is to change yourself such that you do not relate to those things in your life via stress, worry, and anxiety. Stopping the thoughts will not resolve the underlying emotional issues. It will actually make it harder to do so as you will lose a potentially valuable tool to help you notice when you are feeling not good.

You may be saying that you are not able to be aware of how you are feeling and when you go from feeling good to feeling bad because of a lack of attention. That is possible, but my advise would be that you can train this type of attention by using the actualism method rather than a meditative method.

One key distinction to make here is a difference between affective awareness and cognitive attention. The former is a literally intuitive “How am I feeling right now?” which is arrived at by affectively/intuitively/emotionally “feeling yourself out” to see whether the current mood or emotion is happy, sad, angry, good, bad, etc. I suggest you try this out right now to get the flavor of it.

The latter is an attention at the level of thoughts – eg what color is this thing I am seeing? Is this sensation in my body more of a dull pressure or a sharp pressure?

The actualism method is about establishing that affective awareness on an ongoing basis – basically getting to where you self-monitor your moods on a constant and consistent basis. This is much easier to do than the latter as it doesn’t interfere with any cognitive tasks you may be doing (like computer work). They are two different types of attention, in other words.

It does indeed take some doing to get used to it, and it is a skill to a degree. But if attention of this type is lacking, the best way to train it up is to do precisely that! In other words, consciously go about and train this very type of attention. Instead of sitting and just observing senses, thoughts, and feelings, without reacting or judging them – you could even do the same sitting, but instead be monitoring your affective states and experiences.

In other words, to the degree that lack of attention is actually an impediment to your actualism practice, to that same degree you can solve that issue with the tools used to facilitate the actualism method. It is, in other words, a self-contained method that entails everything needed to succeed in it.

To whatever degree lack of the proper type of attention is resolved by mindfulness meditation – it will be resolved better by applying the actualism method.

What this means is that there is ultimately only one category or type of reason to be preferring mindfulness meditation over the actualism method, which is that it provides something different than what the actualism method does. And that is where it is worthwhile to get into the aims and ultimate goals of each to distinguish them and see how they are different. And then you can really make an informed choice of what you want.

This touches upon a core issue which may be why you are being drawn to mindfulness rather than actualism. What is the nature of you as a person? What does it mean to be a ‘bad person’?

I have found a more beneficial way to put it rather than if I am a good or a bad person is – look, I am a person! I am a human. What does it mean? Every human has ‘good’ and ‘bad’ aspects. What I have come to see is that I, too, have ‘bad’ aspects. No matter how much I may deny it or insist it doesn’t define me – I am ‘bad’ in various ways (as well as ‘good’ in various ways).

This used to cause me great consternation. I don’t want to be ‘bad’! But I found it was much more beneficial to simply accept that I am ‘bad’ in various ways – as everyone is (so it’s not personal). Thus rather than recoil from a bad thought I have, as to the implications of what it might mean for ‘me’ being ‘bad’… I accept that I am a human, and part of the human condition are these bad thoughts and bad aspects.

This entirely removes a reactionary layer and makes it much easier to see and accept that I am the way that I am… which then makes it possible to change that, so I no longer express that aspect of myself in that way, and instead of suppressing the badness, I rather express myself in a felicitous way instead. This is essentially what the actualism method is about – neither expressing nor suppressing either ‘good’ or ‘bad’ feelings, minimizing them, and instead expressing and maximizing the felicitous ones.

But you do have to accept that whether you identify with it or not, you are the reason you have the bad thought – it isn’t someone else that is having it after all! And that together with the ‘good’ aspects of yourself, these ‘bad’ and ‘good’ together are, indeed, who you are as a feeling-being. There is just no way around it, ultimately.

Accepting this, really accepting this, is a tremendous relief, and goes a long way towards resolving various emotional troubles that may be causing consternation.

“Dissociation” just means “separation from”. You are separating yourself from your thoughts.

A dissociated state is one in which you walk about and thoughts may or may not arise and they don’t have anything to do with ‘me’ so they’re not an issue.

This is also a great way to avoid fixing actual issues in your life. Whenever thoughts about it arise you “don’t judge” and “don’t react” and “let them subside” and then never actually fix the issue, despite recurring thoughts about it.

I’ll re-iterate what I said earlier: the negative emotions are what is actually the problem. It’s perfectly possible to think negative thoughts about ‘bad’ things, while being felicitous, and utilizing those thoughts to resolve some issue about a genuine problem in one’s life. And doing so does not take away from the felicitous mood.

Mmmmm it’s interesting! You appear to be grouping together what I said here about the nature of the soul and the ego, with the metaphysics of a religious believer.

Metaphysics are indeed impossible to prove or disprove, one either believes in it or not, and there’s no real arguing about it.

However, what I wrote here is more akin to describing how a computer works, down to the nitty-gritty. Ultimately a computer is a series of circuits where high voltage represents a positive, 1, or ‘true’ value, while low voltage represents a neutral, null, 0 or ‘false’ value. These circuits can be combined together with various logical gates, for example one which outputs a high voltage if and only if both inputs are high (an AND gate). And you can then build flip-flops out of these circuits that are the basics of how to form computer memory… then combining circuits into a CPU, which runs machine code, which is generated by compiling assembly code, which is generated by an even higher-level compiler from a language like C or C++, etc., etc.

It would be odd if the reaction to describing how a computer works is that it’s like a Jehova’s witness, isn’t it!

What I came to realize is that it is entirely possible to figure out how I tick, how the human psyche is structured, in this lifetime, without reference to any metaphysics… it’s a factual process of uncovering how I tick, not unlike figuring out how a computer ticks! It’s just a lot more difficult as I’m investigating myself and emotions and passions can make that difficult. But ultimately it is the same.

So when I say ‘soul’ I don’t mean “that which survives death” but rather, the seat of the emotions, the psyche, who you yourself are experiencing yourself to be right now. I wrote more about it here: Appreciation, the key to enjoyment and becoming likeable and liking - #7 by claudiu .

It’s like that with all that you quoted but this is long enough so I’ll leave it here for now. If you have any specific queries you want answered then let me know.

It’s not a matter of being dismissive but more that I have trod the path you have trod and found it to be lacking. So as you are my fellow human being I thought I would warn you away from it. But it is your choice, of course.

I’ll leave on this note:

You have to consider that the MDMA experience was of a single 21-year old – would you say the same when you were in that situation vs having a family now?

In any case, you may be alluding to that it was the drugs that caused the harm that I experienced. But it is not the case – note from the report: “In any case, even at the time I knew drugs were obviously not the answer, so I started seeking out how I can make my day-to-day experience more like how I was that night.”

In other words, that experience was the impetus for me starting on the spiritual journey, but what continued to propel me on it was not a constant ingesting of substances, but rather, a full-hearted diving into precisely that spiritual path and putting all efforts into it.

And I’m not the only one. A researcher at Brown University even explicitly studied this phenomenon of how meditation ruined people’s lives. You may find this article about it illuminating: The Dark Knight of the Soul - The Atlantic : “For some, meditation has become more curse than cure. Willoughby Britton wants to know why.” . It ends on a very relevant note:

“I understand the resistance,” says Britton, in response to critics who have attempted to silence or dismiss her work. “There are parts of me that just want meditation to be all good. I find myself in denial sometimes, where I just want to forget all that I’ve learned and go back to being happy about mindfulness and promoting it, but then I get another phone call and meet someone who’s in distress, and I see the devastation in their eyes, and I can’t deny that this is happening. As much as I want to investigate and promote contemplative practices and contribute to the well-being of humanity through that, I feel a deeper commitment to what’s actually true.”

Cheers & all the best in your journey,
Claudiu

3 Likes

Thank you really for taking the time to write your reply!

I used to be extremely anxious, like going entire days with a constant feeling of anxiety. Meditation didn’t help lessen it, and I was attempting to use meditation to quiet the anxious thoughts, with the idea that once the anxious thoughts are gone I would be ok/at peace. But I came to see that the problem wasn’t the anxious/negative thought per se, but rather the feeling of anxiety that was running as an undercurrent, ‘behind’ the thoughts.

That’s something that we are doing different. I’m not attempting to quiet any thoughts at all, and I don’t think doing would bring me peace.

I came to see, for example, that when I was feeling anxious, I had a lot of anxious and ‘bothersome’ thoughts about topics A, B, and C. But when I was in a good mood, I did not have these anxious thoughts. I could even think essentially the exact same things about A, B, and C… but they were not bothersome thoughts anymore!

That’s great and that’s exactly what I’m trying to accomplish. I want to be able to think about the negative A, B and C without bring back the negative feelings. And, for some reason, during the normal day activities I’m unable. However, during the meditation I’ve been having good results by just observing A, B and C and letting them be. It sounds silly when I write this… It is something I need to investigate more for sure.

In other words the problem never was the negative thoughts, it was the negative emotions and feelings and worry underlying the thought. This allowed me to actually do something about the actual problem – the negative emotions – which thereby also resolved ‘for free’ the problem of the negative thoughts.

The thing is I don’t seem to manage to investigate feelings apparently like you do. I really can’t find a way to change them, or the thoughts. That’s why simply observing them is so refreshing… That I can do!

I would just advise that you do this with the actualism method instead of with meditation, as the former will have a better impact on your life.
you are currently finding mindfulness meditation to be helpful – it doesn’t make sense for you to stop unless you replace it with something even better than that. I write this message with the intent that you can see for yourself how you can do this – it won’t even be a big change practically.

I tried before, for quite some time. There must be something that I’m not able to accomplish. I’m not able to get back to neutral. Would you mind sharing a bit more about this? I can’t say I’ve read everything there is to read about the method, but I think I covered pretty decently and yet…

However there are many sneaky premises buried in these superficially neutral instructions. One is that you must not ‘judge’ any of it. Another is you must not ‘do’ anything about it – just observe. This already is serving to separate you from what you are experiencing. The normal way to be is to engage with the world around us

Ok, I see your point here.

If you seek more information you will see that intrinsic to this type of meditation is to “see” that there is actually no ‘self’ at all, all that can be experienced is a series of sensations

Ok… your description here doesn’t seem that far from self-immolating to get rid of the “‘self’ as a mediator, interpreter, censor or spoiler” so that “all is directly evidenced by the physical senses” (Peter, in the introduction). Can you please clarify how these are different? Is it the difference between experiencing the sensations and being the sensations? I never really understood what that actually means.

One key distinction to make here is a difference between affective awareness and cognitive attention. The former is a literally intuitive “How am I feeling right now?” which is arrived at by affectively/intuitively/emotionally “feeling yourself out” to see whether the current mood or emotion is happy, sad, angry, good, bad, etc. I suggest you try this out right now to get the flavor of it.

I’ll try my best…

The latter is an attention at the level of thoughts – eg what color is this thing I am seeing? Is this sensation in my body more of a dull pressure or a sharp pressure?

Ok. That’s an interesting distinction.

I accept that I am a human, and part of the human condition are these bad thoughts and bad aspects.

Ok, yes. I see what you are saying.

This is also a great way to avoid fixing actual issues in your life. Whenever thoughts about it arise you “don’t judge” and “don’t react” and “let them subside” and then never actually fix the issue, despite recurring thoughts about it.

Yes, I see what you are saying regarding the improvements I’m seeing being temporary and possibly counterproductive.

You appear to be grouping together what I said here about the nature of the soul and the ego, with the metaphysics of a religious believer.
Metaphysics are indeed impossible to prove or disprove, one either believes in it or not, and there’s no real arguing about it.
What I came to realize is that it is entirely possible to figure out how I tick, how the human psyche is structured, in this lifetime, without reference to any metaphysics… it’s a factual process of uncovering how I tick

What I was referring to is that I don’t think we can actually know for sure how those processes associated to conscious actually works. I too tend to think that these must be simply physical complex processes but there’s no guarantee there’s actually anything metaphysical involved. Experience sometimes can trick us (eg: I see the sun moving around me but it’s the earth that is moving around the sun). But ultimately, I don’t really need to know with all the scientific details how my mind works. But I am suspicious when people seem to have it all figured out, without any doubt whatsoever about our nature and/or the nature of the universe.

You have to consider that the MDMA experience was of a single 21-year old – would you say the same when you were in that situation vs having a family now?

Probably not. I wasn’t trying to pass a judgement but I guess it came out that way. I’m sorry about that.

A researcher at Brown University even explicitly studied this phenomenon of how meditation ruined people’s lives. You may find this article about it illuminating

It is indeed an interesting article, but please see how there are also a number of articles that don’t align with your point of view. I understand that you may say that the benefits reported are not permanent and people may be, at best, putting the dirt under the carpet. I’ll consider that if I come across any sort of these types of articles in the future.

Cheers & all the best in your journey,
Claudiu

Thank you again for your time. I decided to reply already because I had some time but I will make sure I’ll get back and re-read what you wrote again when possible. Again I’m grateful that you took the time to share you experience with me.

All the best for you too Claudiu :yellow_heart: Your first message got me on the defense for some reason, but this one felt very positive and friendly. You are an excellent communicator.

5 Likes

Haha, thank you for your honesty - - I hadn’t considered that answer. Might you have been raised in the Christian faith? I was, and my belief in pacifism ran deep, and lingered around manifesting itself despite logically seeing its shortcomings.

A few realizations helped:

  1. I cared more about the feeling-being inside someone than I cared about their actual well-being. These feeling-beings were effectively holding me hostage with all their feelings (that was none other than my imagination projected onto them)
  2. A deep understanding of the human condition, its victim mentality, its self-centeredness, and its depravity and perversion showed me the other side of the coin to many of humanity’s problems. Us bleeding hearts tend to think, “oh these poor people,” without considering the role they play in their own problems and neurosis.
  3. Rooting my life in sincerity and facts offered me a no-nonsense springboard from which to engage people.
  4. The need to belong was tied up in my desire to avoid conflict.

Are you a people-pleaser by chance?

No doubt there are times you can think of where you may wish you have stood up for yourself - but didn’t because of a desire to avoid conflict.

As for feelings vs thoughts - - it’s ‘my’ presence that drives ‘my’ thinking. As soon as ‘my’ presence becomes felicitous and I find myself feeling good, the thinking takes on a different quality.

Thinking can indeed trigger feeling in my experience and it’s what we call “spiraling.” Thoughts breed like rabbits and imagination provides endless possibilities. But the initial thought, is born out of how I was feeling at the time. Subsequent thoughts are fed by this feeling which in turn grows driving more and more thoughts. To me, it seems like a feedback loop and an addiction.

And all of the thinking is aimed and resolving the feeling - - in a conditional, self-centered way. It’s like giving a child what they want when they’re throwing a temper tantrum.

However, all the while during these moments one’s better sensibilities are operating and can always be tapped into. It’s a small “voice” compared to the big “voice” of feelings. It’s what loses out to feelings 9 out of 10 times. One can nurture this faculty and regain one’s dignity in the process.

I hope you can relate to some of this and nice to have you hear.

4 Likes

just want to agree with you that i also think that meditation can be quite helpful in moving towards actual freedom as well, as long as it isn’t used as an escape or to try to attain certain states (which is pretty common)

it’s a useful way to quickly cultivate the habit of paying attention to whatever’s immediately going on, and not trying to escape it. of continually calling your attention back to whatever is directly in front of you. it can provide a good low-stimuli space to come to recognize how good it just feels to breathe and be a body, without anything else needed, which is the very foundation of “feeling good” that you can always return to. and i’ve found that in the absence of stimuli, there are many things such as boredom and agitation that will arise that you can explore, understand, and learn how to navigate.

it only becomes an issue when you withdraw from your life to chase meditative bliss; otherwise, it’s just a practice which can then help you bring that level of awareness to everything else in your life. i meditated a lot and i actually think it’s quite foundational to my capacity to do the actualism method as frequently as possible, because i already trained my attention to constantly come back to whatever’s going on (the only difference now from my previous practice is the extra attention on the enjoyment of the physical experience, which makes it easier to not get sucked into thought and to look clearly at agitating emotions)

1 Like

@roy I applaud you for sticking with the topic instead of running for the hills (or back to the ‘tried and true’) this is certainly unusual and is a quality that is so essential for success with actualism.
This is something that is clearly visible in your writing, an active perspicacity and a sincerity to get to the bottom of things no matter what the cost to ‘my’ worldview.

I agree that @claudiu is a great communicator and in fact it was his willing and skilful communication that helped me pull out of a major dead end a while back, if you are interested you can see it here - The "Rift".
Although there was 1 thing that I did well too, and that was simply the willingness to stick with the topic long enough for the confusion to clear away.

It’s a shame that so much of what passes for ‘normal behaviour’ is actually an obstruction to constructive communication. As soon as ‘my’ precious feelings, beliefs and principles are questioned then this whole mechanism of diversions swings into action. One of the most crafty aspects of this mechanism is humility - “who am I to know? Who am I to question the collective wisdom or the wisdom of the ancestors?” etc. It’s a very clever ploy actually, as who is going to risk being some megalomaniac in their quest of finding out the facts, it’s ‘safer’ to stay within the group, within the confines of accepted wisdom. This defeatist attitude of “We can never know for sure so let’s be open” - open to what? This attitude is simply an invitation for beliefs and feelings to fill the gap.
It’s interesting that science also venerates humility, it has made it into a virtue. That it is a virtue to never know the answers, that “the more we know the more we don’t know”. Perhaps this was a reactionary response against the dogmatism that was so rife in religion.
But there is a third alternative to either dogmatism or skepticism, to either being ‘closed or open’. The third alternative is the confidence borne out of the direct experience of a fact, this is what the PCE demonstrates, that it is possible to actually find out.
And what the PCE indubitably shows is that the entirety of ‘human wisdom’ arises out of calenture, as Richard wrote - the heartfelt corruption of the mind. Science did not escape this corruption either and for sure those spiritual systems which were invented back when the sun orbited the earth did not haha. Those systems are now enjoying a revival and even some backing from science and popular culture, and this is where an active perspicacity is especially needed. The obvious question for me is this - are those experts actually living their life happily and harmlessly each moment again? And if not then what authority do they actually have?

6 Likes

Thanks to everybody for your input. I’ll come back to add my comments later.

Someone I know committed suicide yesterday.

Sometimes I wonder why I ask myself these questions. Why I spend time with this search. Because the truth is that I have a good life. I’m very lucky and I’m literally living dream I once had for myself. Yes my thoughts burdens me a bit and I feel like a jellyfish that simply drifts around with the currents. But that’s it. But there will come a day when I’ll loose someone very close. Or someone I love will be diagnosed with some life threatening illness. And so I think right now is the right time for this search. And I already know the answer, that everything I need to have and to be and to know is already here. But I want to be able to truthfully and deeply live this truth. Every moment of my life. That everything is perfect as it is and will continue to be, even in the face of hardship and death itself.

Today I’ve been trying to investigate negative feelings whenever they come up instead of observing negative thoughts come and go like I’ve been doing with the meditation. Analyzing the feelings is harder because it requires an active attitude instead of the passive attitude of not intervening, and because I can’t do it in a low stimuli environment (like scout put it) because in that state I don’t really have strong feelings. If I engage with thoughts then sure new feelings appear (the spiraling, how ezdz puts it) but that leads me nowhere. I need to continue practicing the method and see where it takes me. I realize now that I had misunderstood it. I have some trouble memorizing and internalizing text written in English. Maybe it will help if I translate it and/or do a diagram like the ones that are compiled in SimpleActualism.

4 Likes

Yesterday I wrote that I don’t investigate my negative thoughts because it leads me nowhere. I ended up questioning this later and realized that this may happen because of a lack of practice. And this lack of practice may be the result of a belief - the belief that it is unhealthy to investigate negative thoughts.

I found an article on the website about how to effectively investigate thoughts in general and here’s a rendition of it:

How to follow a thought to its conclusion:

  1. Identify and isolate a thought: When I notice a thought arising in my mind, I’ll take note of it by visualizing marking this original thought.

  2. Allow the thought to wander: Let my mind freely associate, following the thought wherever it leads and observe how it branches into side thoughts, creating a chain of related thoughts.

  3. Take note and return: After some time, I can pause and reflect on where my thoughts have taken me, and observe how far I have strayed from the initial thought.

  4. Repeat the process: Resume following the original thought from where I left off, and allow it to wander again, noticing any new branches. Once more, pause, reflect, and return to the original thought.

  5. Continue until completion: Eventually there will be a trunk of thoughts that connect the original idea to some end/conclusion and I’ll have learned something from it.

Additional tips:

  • Writing things down: By writing recurring thoughts down somewhere I can effectively remove them from my head. This is something very practical that Richard suggested which I already do in my life. Even trivial things, like stuff I need to do and can’t forget, can take a lot of space in my mind because I have this burden of revisiting them due to worrying that I’ll forget them. Writing them down removes that worrying.
  • Be kind to myself: The way I talk to myself internally is very critical and harsh and that is a silly thing to do.

I’ll force myself to formally do this at least once a day and write the original idea and the end conclusion to help me remember it later.

2 Likes

This is interesting, I remember reading that article and even specifically trying the exercise that Richard recommends but now that you have summarised it like so I realise this is exactly how I have always explored any aspect of the human condition.
And I would spend a lot of time doing this kind of activity, eventually I got quite into it, I would be quite excited when some new area presented itself and then I could meander through all these different paths until there was no more to be found there.

I was always in 2 minds about this kind of activity, because on one hand it is not required to get back to feeling good and if done without feeling good it can turn into spiralling. On the other hand it is such a great way to get to know ‘myself’ and the human condition, to thoroughly map that landscape until no corners are left unexplored.

I think I was always predisposed to this kind of activity too, I enjoy it, I have always been fascinated by these kinds of things, and if not for the discovery of actualism I would probably be some kind of psychologist/philosopher by now haha.

@Vineeto I would be interested to hear how you see this kind of activity with regards to applying the method? Is there benefit in “meandering through” all the various corners of the psyche, whether that is thought, belief, emotion, passion etc So long as this is not done whilst one is feeling bad.

1 Like

Hi Roy,

Not at all! It was thoroughly enjoyable to write it, and it’s even more delightful to have a correspondent who not only engages with the conversation but is putting what’s discussed into practice as well!

I particularly enjoyed reading your latest two posts as it indicates you’re really on the right track, having changed the focus of your investigation to the negative feelings as the main culprit, rather than the negative thoughts – and you have already found that this is an active and engaged process as opposed to a passive or lackadaisical one.

I also like your post about the article on how to follow a thought to its conclusion – it really explains it well and it shows how thinking something through can be a delightful and enjoyable process. Thoughts really are invaluable as a tool to discover exactly how you tick, in other words, to find out exactly why you feel the way you do, which enables you to then make a choice whether it is sensible to continue feeling that way or whether it is more sensible to feel good, instead. This will enable you to productively use thoughts as a way to really get to the bottom of an issue rather than instinctually circling around in an unproductive manner.


I’ll share some practical advice that I think will be of benefit.

One of the most important things to grasp, which literally took me many years – multiple years, and two visits flying halfway around the world to Australia to visit Richard & Vineeto – is that what the way of living life that has become known as the actualism method[1] actually is is nothing other than consistently enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive.

In other words, it is the consistent enjoyment and appreciation itself that is the actualism method. It is really more an approach to life rather than a instruction recipe to follow per se.

What this means in practical terms is that you know you are applying the method when you are basically feeling good, as in being in a generally good mood – as feeling good facilitates enjoying and appreciating being alive.

The reason this is important is because a lot of people end up (myself included) mistaking the investigation of feelings per se as being the method, or the asking of the question of how they are experiencing being alive as the method. What this would result in is a life spent doing nothing but investigating feelings, which rather requires that you keep having ‘issues’ otherwise you would run out of stuff to investigate! :laughing:

But the point is not the investigating, it’s the genuine feeling good, the actual enjoyment and appreication of it all. In other words, if you are consistently feeling good and no trigger has come up to derail this feeling good, then there isn’t actually any need to investigate anything! The whole point of it is to live your life in an optimum a manner as possible.

Coming from a point of frequently feeling not good, with it being common to experience many negative feelings, this might seem completely impossible, like a pipe dream. But rather than discouraging you, the idea here is to have it clearly in mind what exactly you are aiming for. This will motivate your investigations into negative feelings, as in provide a purpose for them, namely, to ensure a more consistent feeling good.

The way to think of it is that even if it feels like there’s way too much stuff to deal with, there really is only a finite set of things that are affecting you. It may feel like a jumble with constant and often overlapping triggers – and it may very well be. But you can approach it methodically. The best way to think of it is to consider a starting point of already feeling good, as being in a basic good mood. This happens naturally whilst living a normal life, even if someone feels bad most of the time, sometimes they will be feeling good. And then you maintain an ongoing affective awareness of how you are feeling. And at some point, when you now find yourself feeling bad, you will realize that the way you were feeling changed from ‘good’ to ‘bad’. And then it is a matter of seeing specifically what caused that change. There is always something – it doesn’t happen for no reason. Even if you may have no idea what it is – it is in there.

This is when stray thoughts can actually be indicative. I remember early on I would frequently have the thoughts like “/thinking X, /thinking Y, hmm now I"m not feeling good. Hmm what can it be? Well it can’t be X because that doesn’t really bother me. And it can’t be Y because I don’t really care about that…” and it turned out that of course, it was exactly X and Y haha. What was happening there is I had a self-image in mind of being “someone who isn’t bothered by X and Y”. But they were bothering me, as evidenced by those things coming up when I was wondering what is bothering me. So eventually I had to give up that self image and accept that I’m basically just like everybody else, which then allowed me to take the next steps.


Another very practical advice is that the investigation actually works the best from a point of feeling good, rather than in the midst of feeling bad. In the midst of feeling bad it is very easy to keep spiraling and reinforcing the bad feeling and accentuating it.

For me this has been one of the more difficult aspects, because I tend to want to really hold on to my feelings and stick with them. It can feel very important to keep feeling bad in response to something bad that happened! There’s several things that can help with this.

Ultimately what it comes down to is that it is just silly, as in not sensible, to feel bad. This is actually remarkably prosaic. There certainly exist genuinely bad situations and circumstances in life. Like you say, you may lose someone close to you, or someone close to you make get ill. It is an insult to intelligence to somehow try and trick yourself that it isn’t ‘really’ bad. And the other set of normal advice is to cope with it in various ways, accept that life sucks and then you die, and it’s a matter of making the best of it.

But instead of that it’s just a matter of seeing that – how you feel about it does not change the situation one bit. It does not cure someone’s illness to bemoan their fate. Spiraling into a depression does not bring someone back. And, in fact, it makes everything far worse – on top of the actually bad thing happening, your life is now ruined as well as the lives of the people around you. The show “Shrinking” detailed a fictionalized example of this, where the protagonist’s wife was a victim of a drunk driving incident. Her death causes him to completely disconnect from his life and be unable to take care of his teenage daughter, which makes the situation even worse for her as now she has effectively lost two parents instead of just one. And this example is particularly poignant because it shows that feeling bad about these things is ultimately self-centered. Feeling bad is not about the situation and it is not about whoever else is affected by it – it is about ‘you’. It is actually selfless to give up feeling bad and bemoaning one’s fate and instead do what is most sensible and beneficial for all (including yourself) in such a situation.

Of course, the idea is not to try to stop yourself from feeling however you do. If anything, it’s more the opposite – it’s about allowing yourself to feel, even though your self-image might dictate that you “shouldn’t” feel that way. This is particularly important when feeling things that aren’t socially acceptable. For example, getting extremely irritated at your partner or child or coworker for something petty. I am supposed to be a good person, I am not supposed to react in this way… but I do! But, accepting that I feel that way is the necessary first step, after which the rest can follow.

What it comes down to is that it’s essentially another skill, or conditioning, or way of approaching life, which is an ability to just set aside the issue and the topic and get back to feeling good first, for no other reason than that it’s silly to feel bad and doesn’t help with anything. Then, one you are back to feeling good, you can go ahead and investigate, dive in, deeply think about the situation and your relation to it, and change that part of yourself that was triggered such that the next time that same thing happens, you won’t react the same way again.

For mundane stuff this is typically sufficient. It may also be helpful to consider how children typically behave with regards to their emotions: they can get extremely upset and riled up about something, but they are also very quick to let it pass and drop it and get back to playing. There is no need to actually hold onto anything – it’s a very ‘adult’ thing to do in other words haha.

For genuinely bad situations like the ones mentioned earlier, you may wonder how is it possible to feel good even when such factually bad things are happening? What this comes down to is, as Richard put it, “Can I emotionally accept that which is intellectually unacceptable?”[2] In other words, it is a remarkable ability to fully accept and understand that something factually bad has happened/is happening/will happen… and yet on an emotional level, accept it to the point where it doesn’t affect you on a visceral/emotional level anymore. This is the key thing: separating the intellectual understanding of a situation from the emotional reaction to it. This is incredibly refreshing and it is just amazing that it can happen, and it’s wonderfully freeing to be able to then consider the situation from this vantage point, where I find I’m able to make much better decisions about what to do practically.


I made this diagram some time ago that attempts to condense the above into a flow-chart (click to expand it):

A few highlights to help orient:

  • The part that is properly called the “actualism method” is separated out in green – this is the actual enjoyment and appreciation part
  • It thus distinguishes that all the rest are tools to facilitate the method rather than the method itself
  • Note that the answer to “How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?” is always a feeling answer – I am either feeling felicitous (“feeling good”), neutral, bad, or feeling good feelings (a la love & compassion). This highlights that it is an affective monitoring that is warranted, not a cognitive one
  • It highlights how investigation is best to be conducted whilst feeling good, which investigation is itself not the method per se
  • It highlights how if feeling bad the key is to get back to feeling good, with the (meant to be temporary and short-lived) intermediate step of feeling neutral, first – from which point feeling good is much closer
  • It provides an avenue to deal with the inevitable “getting stuck”
  • And it provides a way out of all this endeavour if one just wants to give up (“Life sucks / it’s all stupid / woe is me”) :wink:

I will leave it here for now as I’m sure that is quite a lot to digest!

Cheers & all the best,
Claudiu


  1. ↩︎
  2. ↩︎
3 Likes

Kuba: I was always in 2 minds about this kind of activity, because on one hand it is not required to get back to feeling good and if done without feeling good it can turn into spiralling. On the other hand it is such a great way to get to know ‘myself’ and the human condition, to thoroughly map that landscape until no corners are left unexplored.

I think I was always predisposed to this kind of activity too, I enjoy it, I have always been fascinated by these kinds of things, and if not for the discovery of actualism I would probably be some kind of psychologist/philosopher by now haha.

Vineeto I would be interested to hear how you see this kind of activity with regards to applying the method? Is there benefit in “meandering through” all the various corners of the psyche, whether that is thought, belief, emotion, passion etc So long as this is not done whilst one is feeling bad. (link)

Hi Kuba,

I am surprised you ask because considering your posts that I read in the last year you seem to have used “this kind of activity” quite a lot. The “Silly or Sensible” audio-tape not only explains the fun of constructive thinking and, apart from the advice to be kind to yourself, to replace ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ and ‘good’ and ‘bad’ judgements and principles with a practical matter-of-fact appraisal of “is it silly or sensible”.

These are very useful tools for applying the actualism method of enjoyment and appreciation, whilst sorting out one’s social identity beliefs and values, one’s various feelings and deeper instinctual passions. They have been of great benefit to ‘Vineeto’ and many others. Of course, there is “benefit in “meandering through” all the various corners of the psyche” – until one is ready to take the plunge. You have done this yourself –

Kuba: “although there was 1 thing that I did well too, and that was simply the willingness to stick with the topic long enough for the confusion to clear away.” (link)

Now you arrived at a point, after all your explorations where you have concluded –

Kuba: I see this is what I get to do by becoming actually free. It is to demonstrate by living example that human nature is not set in stone, which means that life is not a sick joke, which means that none of those ‘tried and true’ systems need be entertained anymore. It is to demonstrate by living example that there is a far better solution available. (link)

The only way to “demonstrate by living example that there is a far better solution available” is to actually “Step Out Of The Real World Into This Actual World And Leave ‘Yourself’ Behind Where ‘You’ Belong”. (link)

You are not asking me if you could/should rummage around in the “various corners of the psyche” a bit longer, or do you?

Cheers Vineeto

1 Like

Oh dear…Looks like I was indeed wanting to rummage around some more :laughing:. Perhaps I thought on the 1000th scan of the area I will find the missing key, somewhere buried in the rubble.

Thank you for the reminder, I did have a good laugh at myself when I read your response, because it exposed what I was doing completely.

But at the same time I recognise that I cannot continue doing this forever - creeping up, hanging back, buying time, looking for reassurance etc.

Something useful has come from this actually, which is that I can see now that I always hoped that I could resolve the human condition. That actualism was the tool to accomplish this. That if I rummage around enough eventually the puzzle will click and the human condition will be fixed.

But now I can see that no matter how well I outline that which is rotten to it’s very core, it will still remain rotten!

There was some kind of a hidden assumption there that understanding would automatically lead to resolution, which is simply incorrect. I can understand the human condition thoroughly but it will still remain in existence, just as rotten as always.

It’s like if I was to go and study the various atrocities that happen throughout the globe, I could compile the most exquisite information about the victims, the perpetrators, the conditions etc And by the end of the day those atrocities would still continue happening, there would still be no end to it. I would know the problem but there would be no solution.

3 Likes

So much material here that I can work with… Having someone to interact with, compared to trying to make sense of it all by yourself, is very different.

Now, I just want to add the following to my journal, which I think is important to me…

Edzd never met me and has no idea who I am and yet he clearly gets what’s going on. It’s that bad…

I feel pathetic how reading this made me feel so gooey inside. I am so needy that I get satisfaction from getting this type of attention and validation from complete strangers…

The reason why I felt attacked is clearer at this moment. I’m used to people being all super nice 100% of the time when they talk to me, and I reply in the same way. I’m a people-pleaser and that requires dishonesty. Calling it out, whenever you read something from me that sounds off, can only help me. It may be because in the moment I’m more preoccupied with how I’ll be perceived by those who read it than with being honest with myself and others…

3 Likes

@scout That was my angle, but what @claudiu said got me thinking… The advice I got about the mindfulness meditation practice was to not judge, to not identify, to not engage. It is quite literally about not associating with my thoughts, sensations and feelings. They actually used the phrase “identification with thought” as being the problem. So I get why @claudiu is saying that it can quickly jump from there to more dramatic forms of dissociation. I just did some quick search again as I might be misunderstanding what they meant by “identification with thought” but it doesn’t seem like it. And also, @claudiu has a point when he says that this meditation practice is completely contrary to how you would normally solve problems in your life: you get involved with them and try to fix things. You don’t go on contemplating how bad it is that there’s no food in the fridge.

3 Likes

Right or you don’t “observe without attachment” when a car swerves into you haha. I always thought about the example Richard gave to test for oneself that solipsism is incorrect :

One has to just try putting a spring clip upon one’s nose and a large piece of sticking plaster over one’s mouth for a few minutes to discover what actuality is. As one rips the plaster from one’s mouth and gulps in that sweet and actual air, one knows that one is certainly here on earth, living this life

And of course many would counter this by proposing intellectual answers, not by actually carrying out the test themselves! :laughing:

3 Likes

I ended up trying to do my homework here and answer it myself but I don’t know enough about spiritualities to do a comparison so I described it instead. It’s Actualism 101 but it won’t hurt me to recap:

In Actualism you recognize that there is a fabriquated/imagined self. This psychological self is simply a combination of instinctual passions (the instinctual being: your biologic default programming) accompanied of beliefs (the social identity/societal conditioning) and resulting emotions. To become actually free is to get rid of it (what is referred to as psychological/psychic self-immolation). As a result, you don’t try to transcend the physical world, what happens is that you stop experiencing sensations, you become the sensations (there’s no intermediary: there’s no thinker of thoughts or feeler of feelings) in which there is no interference of thoughts, beliefs or emotions. There’s a shift in which you stop focusing intently on specific objects or thoughts and instead a broader awareness of all types of unfiltered sensory input emerges and so everything becomes more engaging and delightful (because there’s no self to distort anything).

Becoming sensations instead of experiencing sensations can be felt during a PCE:

I went over this again… because I began to question if what I had were PCEs. I think they were.

What I have, I can only describe how it feels like, when I remember it, after it ends. And it’s like if it was a “dream” in the sense that everything was perfect and happened automatically without me intervening at all (no choices, no doubts, no emotions…) and in the sense that I had no notion of time passing. Colors and taste can be described as perfect, I can see that. But I can’t say that when I hear “becoming the sensations” I’m reminded of how it felt like. In a way, in these episodes I don’t realize how different I am: it’s simply that everything works out great and I’m not messing it up and I’m not thinking about it.

2 Likes

Hi Roy,

What you write here does sound like they could be PCEs – at least it does not discount it! Only you will be able to know from sure. It will become clearer with more experience. (As the PCE is so vital a guiding light I advise you to have really high standards as to what you call a PCE, and to be very confidently sure in what it is before you put too much stake in it.)

About “becoming the sensations”, maybe it helps to think of it like this. As you read the words I’m writing here, try intuitively feeling yourself out. Answer the question, how do you know that you exist? You who is reading this right now!

With normal consciousness, the answer will be a felt-out answer. You feel yourself to exist. You are present to yourself via this intuitive/affective faculty. The answer is a felt-out one because ultimately who you are is a feeling-being, you are your emotions and your emotions are you – there is no separation between the two. An emotion is thus just a manifestation of your self. Your self is the movement of these emotions. And this comes with it a felt sense of feeling to exist.

What may have happened is that you read the reports of PCEs, and Richard’s description of it, and you understood it that who you are feeling yourself to be right now, will “become the sensations” rather than “experiencing sensations”. However, that is not what a PCE is, and it’s not how it comes about.

I’ll draw your attention to the following by adding emphases:

What you will notice is that it’s not that ‘who’ I am becomes the sensations… rather, ‘who’ I am disappears entirely!

Then, what is left, what remains after ‘who’ I am disappears, is what I actually am, which is “these sense organs in operation” and so forth.

So, it’s not that ‘who’ you feel yourself to be right now transforms or transmogrifies into being the sensations directly – rather, ‘you’ who is reading this disappears, and what remains will be an actually-existing flesh and blood body, which goes by the name of Roy. Actual Roy is then apperceptively aware of himself existing as a flesh and blood body. In a PCE you will see that you no longer feel yourself to exist; instead, there is an awareness that you actually exist, that this universe actually exists, that this is all factually and tangibly happening. This actual Roy is the one that then is the sense organs in operation – in the PCE you are the skin touching and the ears hearing and the eyes seeing and so forth.

This goes some way to explaining why remembering the PCE can be so tricky as you wrote here:

Exactly, ‘you’ disappered as the PCE started and reappeared after it ended, hence ‘you’ can only remember what it felt like outside of the PCE. It seems like a ‘dream’ because ‘you’ were not actually there to experience it.

This can be rather alarming to contemplate at first, but ultimately it is actually reassuring. Because a nature of ‘me’ as a feeling-being is that ‘I’ feel like ‘I’ am very important and that ‘I’ must be here to run the show. It even feels like ‘I’ am required for consciousness to even function in the first place! Yet by ‘me’ disappearing and it being clear that this body functions perfectly well, and even better, without ‘me’ in the picture, with consciousness functioning even more smoothly and far more enjoyably than usual, ‘I’ start to be able to get the sense that ‘I’ am not needed after all. This is ultimately a tremendous relief as it means it is ok for ‘me’ to lay down the burden that it is to be ‘me’ (and what a burden it is!)

In terms of remembering the PCE, the reason it can be so tricky is that normally we are used to remembering experiences by using our affective memories – essentially we remember them by how they felt at the time. And this dimension of experiencing simply is not operating during the PCE. There’s no affective memories of it as such.

However, there is a common thread that can occur both inside and out of a PCE, which has been termed “pure intent”. Much has been written about pure intent, and the topic page is a good resource to read more about it: Topics – Pure Intent . What it ultimately amounts to is that it is “a manifest life-force; a genuinely occurring stream of benevolence and benignity that originates in the perfect and vast stillness that is the essential character of the infinitude of the universe”.

My advice would be to read as much about pure intent as you can, and, the next time you find yourself in a PCE, contemplate the various things you have read about it, and see if you can experientially find it and experience it for yourself. Then you will have a referent[1] for the term. The delightful thing about it is that, as the PCE wears off, you can maintain an awareness of the purity of the actual world. This experiential connection to actuality is pure intent. You can unravel it from the PCE like a metaphorical ball of thread, such that whenever you want to go back towards actuality, all you have to do is follow the thread back to the PCE.

It might also work simply to read about pure intent and also various descriptions of PCEs (and the FAQ entry on “Where does pure intent come from?” might be helpful as well) and see if you can identify it in your experience already. If you think you have found it then try following it to see where it goes. You will know you found it if it leads to a PCE :slight_smile:

Pure intent is invaluable on the wide and wondrous path to actuality, and it makes the journey far more wondrous and amazing.

Cheers & hope this helps,
Claudiu


  1. referent: the thing in the world that a word or phrase denotes or stands for. ↩︎

1 Like

Kuba: Vineeto I would be interested to hear how you see this kind of activity with regards to applying the method? Is there benefit in “meandering through” all the various corners of the psyche, whether that is thought, belief, emotion, passion etc So long as this is not done whilst one is feeling bad. (link)

Vineeto: You are not asking me if you could/should rummage around in the “various corners of the psyche” a bit longer, or do you?

Kuba: Oh dear … Looks like I was indeed wanting to rummage around some more . Perhaps I thought on the 1000th scan of the area I will find the missing key, somewhere buried in the rubble.
Thank you for the reminder, I did have a good laugh at myself when I read your response, because it exposed what I was doing completely.

Hi @Kuba,

It was easy to spot, you had said yourself that solving problems is one of your favourite past-times and that you like inventing some more just to enjoy solving them.

It was funny that you asked my for assessment of Richard’s advice how to think, how to be kind to oneself and how to apply silly or sensible. ‘Vineeto’ was one of the participants of those audio-taped conversations (Q(2)) at the time and these were the ‘her’ first new ‘directions’ how to think in a different manner to the spiritually indoctrinated practice of “leave your mind at the door”. It was incredible refreshing and encouraging to be allowed to use ‘her’ brain again!

Kuba: But at the same time I recognise that I cannot continue doing this forever – creeping up, hanging back, buying time, looking for reassurance etc.
Something useful has come from this actually, which is that I can see now that I always hoped that I could resolve the human condition. That actualism was the tool to accomplish this. That if I rummage around enough eventually the puzzle will click and the human condition will be fixed.
But now I can see that no matter how well I outline that which is rotten to its very core, it will still remain rotten!
There was some kind of a hidden assumption there that understanding would automatically lead to resolution, which is simply incorrect. I can understand the human condition thoroughly but it will still remain in existence, just as rotten as always.
It’s like if I was to go and study the various atrocities that happen throughout the globe, I could compile the most exquisite information about the victims, the perpetrators, the conditions etc. And by the end of the day those atrocities would still continue happening, there would still be no end to it. I would know the problem but there would be no solution. (link)

There is indeed no other way to solve the core of the human condition but to dissolve it, i.e. to leave it behind. It can be a sobering realisation but it is also a very liberating one – you can clean it up until the moon turns blue to no avail – in the final analysis it has no redeeming features given the perfect alternative now available.

In other words you can drop it, right here, right now.

Cheers Vineeto

Roy: I went over this again … because I began to question if what I had were PCEs. I think they were.
What I have, I can only describe how it feels like, when I remember it, after it ends. And it’s like if it was a “dream” in the sense that everything was perfect and happened automatically without me intervening at all (no choices, no doubts, no emotions…) and in the sense that I had no notion of time passing. Colors and taste can be described as perfect, I can see that. But I can’t say that when I hear “becoming the sensations” I’m reminded of how it felt like. In a way, in these episodes I don’t realize how different I am: it’s simply that everything works out great and I’m not messing it up and I’m not thinking about it. (link)

Hi Roy,

Thank you for the feedback. It is vital to know if one’s PCEs were the genuine article because they are your only reliable experiential lodestone, your reference guide for what you are aiming for. Other actualists’ words can give you confirmation but only you yourself can verify by direct experience the facticity of what is written.

PCEs can be of a different quality and length and each one gives more information about aspects of the actual world. Personally, ‘Vineeto’ looked for the magical element in ‘her’ PCEs, which for ‘her’ were the best indicators if it was an excellence experience (link) or a PCE. And when ‘she’ experienced in a PCE that this is how ‘she’ wanted to live ‘her’ life forever, that was the final arbiter.

From the above experiences, you already have gleaned useful information, which you can apply to how to best enjoy and appreciate each moment and that is wonderful (such as “it’s simply that everything works out great and I’m not messing it up” and “no choices, no doubts, no emotions”) … and more will follow.

Regarding “becoming the sensations”, here is an early description from Richard about a PCE where he experienced being the senses only during his enlightened period –

Richard: ‘I remember the first time I experienced being the senses only during a peak experience. There was no identity as ‘I’ thinking or ‘me’ feeling … simply this body ambling across a grassy field in the early-morning light. A million dew-drenched spider-webs danced a sparkling delight over the verdant vista and a question that had been running for some weeks became experientially answered: without the senses I would not know that I exist. And further to this: I was the senses and the senses were me. With this comes an awareness of being conscious … apperception’. [emphasis added] (Richard, AF List, Alan, pce).

This PCE happened when ‘Richard’ was still in the long process of sorting out his altered state of consciousness (1981-1992) when the above-described experience gave ‘him’ some more clues about the actual world –

Richard: Without any identity (‘I’ as ego and ‘me’ as soul) the distance or separation between ‘me’ and ‘my’ senses – and thus the external world – disappears. To be the senses as a bare awareness is apperception, a pure consciousness experience of the world as-it-is. Because there is no ‘I’ as an observer – a little person inside one’s head – to have sensations, I am the sensations. There is nothing except the series of sensations which happen … not to ‘me’ but just happening … moment by moment … one after another. To be these sensations, as distinct from having them, engenders the most astonishing sense of freedom and release. (Richard, AF List, Alan, pce).

I am only mentioning this so you can understand that the realisation that “being the senses only” is not necessarily an early information one receives from a PCE, and especially as in normal perception-mode sensate experience is overlaid by feelings, emotions and passions and often feeling-fed thoughts.

Cheers Vineeto