Hunterad's journal

What a wonderful post! Just wanted to chip in here:

The answer to this will be experiential, but just wanted to point out that, being naive does not mean going around believing what everybody says and being unable to lie or deceive people when it makes sense to do so. Viz.:

RESPONDENT: Do you live a moral life? If so, why?
RICHARD: Being free from malice and sorrow, I am automatically happy and harmless. Thus I have no need for morals whatsoever. Morals are designed to control the wayward self.
RESPONDENT: Would you lie, cheat and steal?
RICHARD: If the situation calls for it, yes indeed. Whilst some semblance of social order prevails, such actions as stealing are not necessary. The government bureaucracy however, being adversarial by nature, occasionally calls for some creative massaging of the truth regarding my life-style. [link]

Believing what everyone says (including deceitful people) and being unable to deceive them back when prudent to do so, is how a child goes about the world, because they don’t know any better. However, having more experience in life, you do know better, and this experience doesn’t go away just because you are more sincere and naive.

I actually have found the opposite – the more clean and clear and sincere I, myself, am, the easier it becomes to read other people and spot when something isn’t quite right.

The way I’d put it is like this: actually the ‘normal’ way of going about the world is one in which I have many and various buttons to press, and particularly cunning people can find and press them in order to hoodwink me. With fewer of these buttons, that just doesn’t work… and having gotten used to just always wanting to find what the facts are, and refusing to accept things which don’t make sense, it’s just very easy to spot when something doesn’t actually add up and then see why it is the case.

So in other words I wouldn’t worry about it, I encourage you to go ahead and try it, incrementally so even, just a bit at a time you feel comfortable with and see how it goes :slight_smile:

Cheers,
Claudiu

3 Likes

Hey Claudiu, this really rings true. Throughout today, partly buoyed by the contemplation that went into writing this post, I found myself very automatically naive. I distinctly noticed that I was better able to read people. I think one contributing factor to that is I felt so confident in the cleanness of my intentions that any ‘unclean’ elements I could easily trace to the person I was interacting with. Normally there’s a big mess of the self-centered intentions I’m concealing.

AdamH: The other big change in this time was entering into my first (still ongoing) long-term relationship with my girlfriend. We’ve been living together and spending almost all of our free time together all this time, in relatively good (but far from perfect) harmony and intimacy. There’s no other place in my life where there is such direct feedback for the quality of my actualism practice as there is in how I experience our relationship. When I’m not applying the actualism method, the relationship can feel unfair and stifling, while when I am applying it things can feel incredibly intimate to the point of feeling magical, like there is no separation between us. These ways of experiencing can alternate fairly rapidly where I feel like I can ascend and descend through that spectrum of experience in the course of a week. With ‘work stress’ on the other hand where relationships are much more measured and controlled, that same alternation in mode of experience is much more internal.

Hi Adam,

Welcome back to the forum. Great to hear your detailed report and success.

As you have mentioned stress, and work stress in particular, maybe this is the topic to direct your affective attentiveness to in order to determine what causes you to feel this stress in the first place.

There is not much point aiming for naiveté or even “care to be innocence personified” (which only an actually free person can be) before you are able to recognize, dismantle and abandon the triggers for feeling stressed. You say that stress equally affects your mood in your “first-time” relationship, so the feeling of stress can have multiple and diverse as yet unexamined reasons. Once you start paying close attention you will find a treasure-trove of exciting discoveries that can make your life instantly better when you understand each issue more fully as how ‘you’ tick – and thus be able to get back to feeling good and appreciating much more quickly.

AdamH: My focus, inspired by the successes of several participants and their interactions with Vineeto, has mostly been on diving into naivete. This has been a process of making an effort to recognize that I am my feelings, that I can choose how I want to be, and that being naiveté is essential to (or perhaps the same as?) being happy and harmless.

This is excellent. Still stress, according to your report, seems to interrupt feeling good and wants to be addressed –

Gary: I gave some thought as to whether I am ‘tracking’ the waking entity, and I think I am. I seem to go over the same emotions over and over again and the same repetitive thoughts until I give up the chase and relax, often to but take up the tracking the next day.
Richard: If it be not fun to track oneself in all of one’s doings then one might as well ‘give up the chase and relax’ … however what you describe as a modus operandi does not make sense to me (‘go over the same emotions over and over again and the same repetitive thoughts until I give up the chase and relax’).
To need to (and to be able to) ‘relax’ means there must be tension in the first place to relax from … thus the tracking down has changed from tracking down the ‘same emotions’ or the ‘same repetitive thoughts’ to tracking down the tension … and you did not notice that the game had changed horses in mid-stream. The need to ‘relax’ is a flashing red light that the game-play has changed: ‘when did this tension start?’; how did this tension begin?’; ‘what was the event that initiated this tension?’; ‘what were the feelings at the time?’; ‘what was the thought associated with that feeling?’ … and so on. Usually one has only to track back a few minutes or a few hours … yesterday afternoon at the most. Then one is free from both the tension and the ‘Tried and True’ cure of ‘relax’.
Speaking personally, I never relaxed in all those years of application and diligence, patience and perseverance … upon exposure to the bright light of awareness the tension always disappeared. [Emphasis added]. (Richard, AF List, Gary, 28 Jan 2001)

AdamH: I remember being particularly stirred by this from Vineeto:

Vineeto to Kuba: With the thrilling permission for ‘you’ to die and the passionate care to be innocence personified in place you have blessed set in motion your demise – nothing can go wrong. (link)

AdamH: especially the endorsement of Kuba’s ‘passionate care to be innocence personified’, recognizing that it had never really been part of how I approached actualism.

Of course, it is beneficial to experiment with being naïve and use all the good tips and information Claudiu (link) just gave you. What feeling being ‘Vineeto’ found that for ‘her’ being naïve was at first not easy to establish, ‘she’ had to have success in other areas with applying the actualism method consistently and rigorously, such as dismantling various beliefs, and all the while ‘she’ was determined to be ruthlessly honest with herself and being more and more sincere. Out of that sincerity ‘she’ then could allow ‘herself’ to be more and more unsophisticated and guileless.

Richard: There is a marked distinction betwixt spontaneity and impetuosity (aka impulsiveness) … acuity and/or perspicacity, in the applied form of discrimination, discernment (as in being expedient, provident, judicious, prudent) in conjunction with pragmatism, practicality, sensibility, simplicity, and so forth, gives ready access for any introspective/ creative process to take place. With no identity in situ/ no affective faculty extant, to stuff things up, it is all quite effortless. (Richard, AF List, No. 103, 1 Oct 2005d)

You can change Richard’s last sentence to “with a diminished identity in situ/ a diminished affective faculty extant” – then it becomes clear that the more diminished the identity becomes, naiveté will increase accordingly.

AdamH: Since then, I’ve been attempting to galvanize that passionate care which is for this body and everybody to flourish through ‘my’ seeking naivete, which is inextricably linked to seeking my end. Directly recognizing that my calculating/ guileful tendencies are the very thing that prevents happiness and harmless is a small step from seeing that my being is the very thing that prevents perfection. (link)

Mmh, becoming more and more happy and increasingly harmless, i.e. considerate, in your daily life is the best thing you can do for your fellow beings right now, particular for your partner, and of course for yourself. In other words, when you emanate less and less stressful feelings and vibes and are able to neither suppress them nor acting on them, and/or eventually not having them arise in the first place, the less you contribute to stress circulating and multiplying. Start from where you are at, and with pure intent the progress of the actualism method will fall into place organically.

It’s best to avoid creating conceptual maps, which you then try to follow, as this methodology, so tempting for many, only leads to strife (stress), self-deception, and ultimately disappointment … and is in the very opposite to being naïve.

I snipped the next section because Claudiu has already answered it. (link).

Cheers Vineeto

1 Like

Thanks Vineeto

Interesting, it seems like your overall impression is that I’m putting the cart before the horse a bit. I can confirm that the investigation side of my practice has maybe been a bit light recently. I wouldn’t say I neglect it entirely but it certainly hasn’t been the focus. With the flavor of naivete powerfully enticing me right now, I’m definitely interested in making it more consistent, so thank you for the advice that the way to do so is more focus/investigation on the issues that interrupt it.

I think I am on the same page in terms of the ruthless honesty with myself, and it is clear to me how the sincerity of that intention segues into naivete. Basically if I am really honest about how and why I’m not happy and harmless, it segues into an experiential realization that ‘I’ am the problem, which segues into perceiving the world as fundamentally friendly and wonderful.

The form that this takes for me right now is mostly focused on intentions and vibes more than beliefs, which may be a shortcoming. This is related to previous struggles going in circles of ‘philosophizing and psychologizing’ in the past when my practice did have more focus on investigation.

It’s somewhat rare that I get back to feeling good by recognizing an unexamined belief, much more often it’s closer to a ‘resolution’ that I don’t want to experience life this way, fueled by the memory that it’s possible to experience life in a totally opposite way, plus the memory that once I am experiencing life in that other way all of those ‘problems’ will seem imaginary and get dealt with in a manner that is effortless and harmless. Perhaps what is necessary is that once I get into that state where all the problems melt away and seem imaginary, what I need to do is basically dive back into them and closely examine how and why they seemed real vs. how and why they now seem imaginary? Or is there something more fundamentally off with how I’m approaching things?

AdamH: Thanks Vineeto

Vineeto: There is not much point aiming for naiveté or even “care to be innocence personified” (which only an actually free person can be) before you are able to recognize, dismantle and abandon the triggers for feeling stressed. You say that stress equally affects your mood in your “first-time” relationship, so the feeling of stress can have multiple and diverse as yet unexamined reasons. Once you start paying close attention you will find a treasure-trove of exciting discoveries that can make your life instantly better when you understand each issue more fully as how ‘you’ tick – and thus be able to get back to feeling good and appreciating much more quickly.

AdamH: Interesting, it seems like your overall impression is that I’m putting the cart before the horse a bit. I can confirm that the investigation side of my practice has maybe been a bit light recently. I wouldn’t say I neglect it entirely but it certainly hasn’t been the focus. With the flavor of naivete powerfully enticing me right now, I’m definitely interested in making it more consistent, so thank you for the advice that the way to do so is more focus/ investigation on the issues that interrupt it.

Hi Adam,

You are welcome.

It may well be only a ‘small cart’ that is ‘before the horse.’

Naturally, being stressed needs “‘good’ investigation”, as Geoffrey said in the quote below, so you can recognize and then decline what causes you stress. As ‘Vineeto’ observed early on, it’s often the ‘good’ feelings such as pride, ambition, loyalty, virtue, being ‘right’ and other feelings like this, which caused the ‘bad’ feelings such as stress to achieve the ‘good’ feeling or disappointment when not achieving it. And unless those ‘good’ feelings are recognized and acknowledged with the ‘bad’ feelings both will stay in situ.

Chrono: Just watched Geoffrey’s video that he shared a while back and something he said in there really helped me right now. It’s essentially that “good” investigation is just seeing what’s preventing me from feeling good right now. There’s no need to get any more complex. I mean I know this has been written many times before and the words are right there in front of my face but hearing it really clicked for me. Because I can basically “investigate” forever and I will always find problems (or create them). So in the context of my discomfort and investigating the discomfort, it is the same thing. So what is preventing me right now from feeling good? It’s basically trying to “do” something to feel good. So simple! I have a tendency to complicate things. Also might be related to how I’ve learned throughout my life to be “sophisticated”. If it’s not difficult, then I’m not doing something right. It became the measure (internally) of if I’m doing something properly. Now it’s like the opposite. If it’s not easy, then something is amiss. [Emphasis added]. (link)

Thus, when you found the trigger, you can get back to feeling good (not the same as having a ‘good’ feeling) and enjoy and appreciate being alive. Make sure, when feeling good that you’ve understood enough of what triggered the feeling so as to not have it happen again. Then naturally you can enjoy even more and increase this enjoyment with appreciation.

Vineeto: What feeling being ‘Vineeto’ found that for ‘her’ being naïve was at first not easy to establish, ‘she’ had to have success in other areas with applying the actualism method consistently and rigorously, such as dismantling various beliefs, and all the while ‘she’ was determined to be ruthlessly honest with herself and being more and more sincere. Out of that sincerity ‘she’ then could allow ‘herself’ to be more and more unsophisticated and guileless.

AdamH: I think I am on the same page in terms of the ruthless honesty with myself, and it is clear to me how the sincerity of that intention segues into naiveté. Basically if I am really honest about how and why I’m not happy and harmless, it segues into an experiential realization that ‘I’ am the problem, which segues into perceiving the world as fundamentally friendly and wonderful.

That’s excellent and it already “segues into perceiving the world as fundamentally friendly and wonderful”.

AdamH: The form that this takes for me right now is mostly focused on intentions and vibes more than beliefs, which may be a shortcoming. This is related to previous struggles going in circles of ‘philosophizing and psychologizing’ in the past when my practice did have more focus on investigation.

I’m not sure what you mean by “intentions” – are they certain plans for the future?

Also I don’t know what you mean by being “focused on … vibes” – are you focused on your vibes (which are essentially your feelings), or are you trying to figure out other people’s vibes in order to respond accordingly?

It is definitely more beneficial to pay affective attention to how you feel and what is preventing you from feeling good rather than guessing other people’s vibes in order to react according to your guesses. One, you can never be sure if these are your feelings or their feelings/vibes and two, your focus is on their feelings rather than your own. The only person you can change is yourself.

AdamH: It’s somewhat rare that I get back to feeling good by recognizing an unexamined belief, much more often it’s closer to a ‘resolution’ that I don’t want to experience life this way, fuelled by the memory that it’s possible to experience life in a totally opposite way, plus the memory that once I am experiencing life in that other way all of those ‘problems’ will seem imaginary and get dealt with in a manner that is effortless and harmless. Perhaps what is necessary is that once I get into that state where all the problems melt away and seem imaginary, what I need to do is basically dive back into them and closely examine how and why they seemed real vs. how and why they now seem imaginary? Or is there something more fundamentally off with how I’m approaching things? (link)

Not fundamentally, just a little tweaking here and there …

Mmh, resolutions generally don’t work as it’s a form of controlling yourself to feel in a certain way – if that is what you mean by “resolution”. Whereas recognizing that your feelings are caused by a certain belief and then are able to replace this belief with a fact, this will make the belief evaporate and thus no ‘resolution’ is required. You don’t need to believe in a fact, it just sits there, unsupported.

“The memory that it’s possible to experience life in a totally opposite way” can strengthen your intent to be/become more happy and harmless, and perhaps allows you to take life less seriously, less sophisticated, more naïvely.

Actual change happens now, only this moment is actual. The past is not happening now neither is the future happening now – that’s why you don’t want to waste this moment by feeling stressed, remembering good intentions and bad decisions or planning/ wishing something in the future.

Now is the only moment you are being alive. Realising this, again and again helps a lot to recognize that feeling bad is just silly.

Here Richard tells a correspondent how to access naiveté whenever you want to –

Richard: Given that it is, plainly and simply, always ‘my’ choice as to how ‘I’ experience this moment then the optimum manner in which to do so is, of course, sincerely/ naïvely.
Thus the part-sentence in that previous post of mine [quote] ‘and to be sincere is to be the key which unlocks naiveté’ [endquote] is worth expanding upon.
The operative words in that part-sentence are [quote] ‘… to be the key …’ [endquote] and with particular emphasis on the word ‘be’ (rather than ‘have’ for instance).
In other words, to be sincerity (not only have sincerity) is to be the key (not merely have the key) to be naiveté (not just have naiveté).
(Bear in mind that, at root, ‘I’ am ‘my’ feelings and ‘my’ feelings are ‘me’ and it will all become clear).
As there is something I have oft-times encouraged a fellow human being to try, in face-to-face interactions, which usually has the desired effect it is well worth detailing here:
Reach down inside of yourself intuitively (aka feeling it out) and go past the rather superficial emotions/ feelings (generally in the chest area) into the deeper, more profound passions/ feelings (generally in the solar plexus area) until you come to a place (generally about four-finger widths below the navel) where you intuitively feel you elementarily have existence as a feeling being (as in ‘me’ at the core of ‘my’ being … which is ‘being’ itself).
Now, having located ‘being’ itself, gently and tenderly sense out the area immediately below that (just above/ just before and almost touching on the sex centre).
Here you will find yourself both likeable and liking (for here lies sincerity/ naiveté).
Here is where you can, finally, like yourself (very important) no matter what.
Here is the nearest a ‘self’ can get to innocence whilst remaining a ‘self’.
Here lies tenderness/ sweetness and togetherness/ closeness.
Here is where it is possible to be the key. (Richard, List D; Srid, 26 May 2009)

Cheers Vineeto

1 Like

Just for a little more clarity on what I meant by intentions and vibes - I did mean my own intentions and vibes. Effectively the ruthless honesty with myself is honesty about my own self-centeredness and harmfulness (which I was loosely referring to as intentions/vibes), which segues into seeing that I’m the problem etc. I was trying to express how, overall, my practice of actualism is focused on the core feelings and attitudes that I have that are opposed to happiness and harmless, less so on the beliefs I have that are opposed to happiness and harmlessness. I’m thinking a bit more focus on beliefs will be beneficial since I haven’t really been thinking about things in terms of beliefs, worldviews, psittacisms lately.

1 Like

Vineeto: I’m not sure what you mean by “intentions” – are they certain plans for the future?
Also I don’t know what you mean by being “focused on … vibes” – are you focused on your vibes (which are essentially your feelings), or are you trying to figure out other people’s vibes in order to respond accordingly?

Adam: Just for a little more clarity on what I meant by intentions and vibes – I did mean my own intentions and vibes. Effectively the ruthless honesty with myself is honesty about my own self-centeredness and harmfulness (which I was loosely referring to as intentions/ vibes), which segues into seeing that I’m the problem etc.

Hi Adam,

Thank you for the clarification.

The way you describe yourself may be ruthless but not very friendly towards yourself. It’s a good idea to treat yourself as a friend and not someone you need to take down. There are already enough others who do that.

Richard: ‘It is important not to view ‘I’ and/or ‘me’ as an enemy – blind nature is the culprit – and to be friends with yourself … only you live with yourself twenty four hours a day. Coopt any aspect of yourself as an ally in this investigation into the human psyche … eventually ‘I’ come to realise that the very best thing that ‘I’ can do is altruistically ‘self’-immolate for the benefit of this body and all bodies’. [endquote]. (Richard, AF List, No. 7, 18 Feb 1999)

Richard: Put succinctly: be kind to yourself … you are the only friend you have, so to speak’. (Richard, AF List, No. 41, 4 Feb 2003).

The actualism method is to enjoy and appreciate being alive – only when something happens, which diminishes this enjoyment and appreciation, then you get back to feeling good and from there look at what triggered the diminishment. There is no need to go out of your way to look for trouble. :blush:

Adam: I was trying to express how, overall, my practice of actualism is focused on the core feelings and attitudes that I have that are opposed to happiness and harmless, less so on the beliefs I have that are opposed to happiness and harmlessness. I’m thinking a bit more focus on beliefs will be beneficial since I haven’t really been thinking about things in terms of beliefs, worldviews, psittacisms lately. (link)

It’s not about which aspect of ‘me’ to focus on but on whatever is happening at this moment – if it’s a belief which causes diminishment in feeling good right now, then this is what you figure out; if it’s a habit, such as resentment or castigating yourself, then you acknowledge and decline this habit by replacing it with something better; if it is a certain attitude, then you look at that and work out in what way you can exchange it for a more beneficial attitude.

As Geoffrey said, “It’s essentially that “good” investigation is just seeing what’s preventing me from feeling good right now. There’s no need to get any more complex.”

Cheers Vineeto

I think in that case I may have described it poorly, because I don’t experience it as a self-castigation. It’s more like this:

  1. I notice I’m not feeling good
  2. I notice that I’m blaming something external for this
  3. I remember that it is possible to feel naive, happy, and harmless even in non-ideal circumstances
  4. I sincerely want to get back to that way of being, and out of that sincerity come to deeply consider that I am my feelings, I’m choosing to react this way, it’s not a necessary outcome of the external circumstances
  5. It starts to dawn on me that what is external is actually friendly/safe/pleasant if only I would let myself experience it without my guard up
  6. I feel foolish but also glad and pleased with myself that ‘I’ was able to admit my foolishness and start to put my guard down
  7. Naivete resumes

Got it, this makes sense, and I can see how it is the opposite of developing a conceptual map to follow.

2 Likes

So I am running into some difficulty getting back to feeling good from a state of stress. Over the last week I observed myself moving from happy and harmless, to good feelings, and now to stress. Although I saw the good feelings replacing naivete as it happened, I basically didn’t have enough motivation to stop it. It basically manifested as taking credit for naivete, congratulating myself, and imagining a future where I was praised for my naivete. Now that the good feelings are replaced with bad, the motivation is there and I am definitely keeping this whole cycle in mind in hopes that it gives me more focus the next time around.

Anyways, stress is what is here now preventing feeling good. The stress is about work (as per usual) and specifically fears about how I am replaceable and ultimately at the mercy of the whims of my boss. I’m also seeing that I’m embarrassed about having this stress, partly because I think it suggests I’m incompetent, and partly because I’ve dealt with it so many times in so many ways that I think I should have really figured it out by now.

Anyway, I don’t think I’ll solve this right here and right now, I’ve been contemplating it while writing this post for a while, but just wanted to get something into my journal while I’m in this spot.

AdamH: So I am running into some difficulty getting back to feeling good from a state of stress. Over the last week I observed myself moving from happy and harmless, to good feelings, and now to stress. Although I saw the good feelings replacing naivete as it happened, I basically didn’t have enough motivation to stop it. It basically manifested as taking credit for naivete, congratulating myself, and imagining a future where I was praised for my naivete. Now that the good feelings are replaced with bad, the motivation is there and I am definitely keeping this whole cycle in mind in hopes that it gives me more focus the next time around.
Anyways, stress is what is here now preventing feeling good. The stress is about work (as per usual) and specifically fears about how I am replaceable and ultimately at the mercy of the whims of my boss. I’m also seeing that I’m embarrassed about having this stress, partly because I think it suggests I’m incompetent, and partly because I’ve dealt with it so many times in so many ways that I think I should have really figured it out by now.
Anyway, I don’t think I’ll solve this right here and right now, I’ve been contemplating it while writing this post for a while, but just wanted to get something into my journal while I’m in this spot. (link)

Hi Adam,

The first thing that occurred to me was that you were feeling good and feeling naïve and then “it basically manifested as taking credit for naiveté” and you were “imagining a future where I was praised for my naiveté”. It could well be that this hijacking of naiveté by ‘’me’ is what caused the original feelings of stress. To fulfil this imagination you would have to manufacture being naïve, which is the very opposite of being naïve, i.e. letting life live you, and therefore a stressful task rather than a joy to be.

Because the feeling of stress continued you then found a likely cause transferring it all to work-related problems. I am not saying they don’t exist but the primary trigger was that your naivete was taken over by the desire to being praised “for my naiveté” – in other words manifested as the co-joined twins of pride and humility, swinging from one end to the other.

I suggest to get back to feeling good, or at least feeling ok, and then see if what I said makes sense to you. Perhaps it helps to understand more of this aspect of your social identity and thus can be declined so you will be able to get back to a more consistent feeling good.

It’s also useful to remember that when you fight/reject any of your feelings you add affective energy to that feeling and thus increase it.

As a reminder, here Richard wrote in detail how to access sincere/ pure intent, which is essential for having success with the actualism method –

Respondent: (…) How did you get the pure intent or how did you keep the intent running? Are there certain events that lead to it’s discovery? Is there are a particular approach you would advise other to get pure intent?
Richard: G’day No. 13, Just putting in a plug for what is propagated by the website.
The ultimate source of an actualist’s pure intent is, of course, the pristine purity of the innocence which prevails in the pure consciousness experience (PCE).
For those who are unable to recall/ unable to trigger a PCE there is the near-purity of the sincerity which inheres in naiveté – the nearest a ‘self’ can get to innocence whilst remaining a ‘self’ – which naiveté is an aspect of oneself locked away in childhood through ridicule, derision, and so on, that one has dared not to resurrect for fear of appearing foolish, a simpleton, in both others’ eyes and, thus, one’s own.
(Because ‘naïve’ and ‘gullible’ are so closely linked – via the trusting nature of a child in concert with the lack of knowledge inherent to childhood – in the now-adult mind, most peoples initially have difficulty separating the one from another).
Now, seeing the fact (as ‘I’ am ‘my’ feelings and ‘my’ feelings are ‘me’) that it is plainly and simply ‘my’ choice as to how ‘I’ experience this moment (the only moment one is actually alive) is a first step leading to its discovery.
And, as the part-sentence you have quoted (further above) has been extracted out from the middle of the first paragraph of the section entitled ‘The Who And How of Attentiveness And Sensuousness And Apperceptiveness’, in the ‘Attentiveness And Sensuousness And Apperceptiveness’ article, then the opening lines provide a clue to an answer for your queries. Viz.:
• [quote] ‘The intent is you will become happy and harmless.
The intent is you will be free of sorrow and malice. The intent is you will become blithesome and benign. The intent is you will be free of fear and aggression. The intent is you will become carefree and considerate. The intent is you will be free from nurture and desire. The intent is you will become gay and benevolent. The intent is you will be free of anguish and animosity. The intent is that, by being free of the Human Condition, you will experience peace-on-earth, in this life-time, as this body … as is evidenced in a pure consciousness experience (PCE) (…)’. [endquote]
Spelled-out sequentially that first part of the paragraph, immediately prior to the part-sentence you extracted, can look something like this:

  1. The initial intent comes from a vital interest in becoming happy and harmless.
    That intent thus creates a vested interest in being free of sorrow and malice.
  2. The initial intent comes from a vital interest in becoming blithesome and benign.
    That intent thus creates a vested interest in being free of fear and aggression.
  3. The initial intent comes from a vital interest in becoming carefree and considerate.
    That intent thus creates a vested interest in being free from nurture and desire.
  4. The initial intent comes from a vital interest in becoming gay and benevolent.
    That intent thus creates a vested interest in being free of anguish and animosity.

    All of this vital interest/ vested interest enables sincerity – as to be in accord with the fact/being aligned with factuality/ staying true to facticity is what being sincere is (as in being authentic/ guileless, genuine/ artless, straightforward/ ingenuous) and to be sincere is to be the key which unlocks naiveté … then the summing-up sentence can now look something like this:
    The [sincere/ naïve] intent, then, is that by being free of the human condition you will experience peace-on-earth, in this life-time, as this body … as is evidenced in the PCE.
    As that summary sentence leads straight on to the sentence you have part-quoted from then it too can now look something like this:
    • [quote]: ‘(…) An actualist’s intent is a [sincere/ naïve] intent and discovering how to blend this [sincere/ naïve] intent via attentiveness – into one’s conscious life is the process that places one on the wide and wondrous path to actual freedom … this path is a virtual freedom’. [end quote] (Richard, Articles, Attentiveness Sensuousness Apperceptiveness)
    Which in turn is immediately followed by the how-to sentences:
    • [quote] ‘Uncovering how to prolong the condition of virtual freedom – via attentiveness and sensuousness – is still another process. These are felicitous and innocuous processes, however, and they are well worth the effort for attentiveness and sensuousness are central to virtual freedom and the key to the whole condition. Attentiveness and sensuousness are both the goal of actualism and the means to that end: one reaches apperceptiveness by being ever more sensuous and one activates sensuousness by being ever more attentive … and one activates attentiveness by no longer ‘feeling good’. [endquote]
    In other words, it is the experiencing of no longer ‘feeling good’ (or ‘feeling happy/ harmless’ or ‘feeling excellent/ perfect’) which activates attentiveness again (as in it ‘jogs the memory’ to pay attention).
    It is all a very, very simple method, actually. (…) (Richard, List D, No. 13, 21 May 2009).

Let me know how it works for you.

Cheers Vineeto

1 Like

Hey Vineeto, I managed to get back to feeling good by contemplating how, if it came down to it, I would sacrifice the things I feel that I’m protecting (namely my job) if it meant I could be perfectly and continuously naive. I also had a moment of realizing that underneath the fears about my job was the fear that I wasn’t likeable (which related to job insecurity, hence my fears about the ‘whims’ of my boss).

Now that I am feeling better and contemplating your suggestion, I definitely think it has some validity. Once I started hijacking the naivete I started feeling insecure about it continuing, and started being oversensitive to other people’s reactions to me. This instantly created a cycle where I became more disingenuous trying to get people to like/value me, which because it had the opposite effect eventually lead to me giving up in a state of self-pity. Anyways, I’m now just tuning into the ‘inherent’ value of being naive, rather than what it gets for me. I’m not quite there but I’m peering over at the state of ‘gay abandon’ and trying to work up the daring to get back to it and let things take care of themselves, let life live me, and give up on the careful control and manipulations. It’s still a little hard to believe everything won’t fall apart though.

1 Like

AdamH: Hey Vineeto, I managed to get back to feeling good by contemplating how, if it came down to it, I would sacrifice the things I feel that I’m protecting (namely my job) if it meant I could be perfectly and continuously naive. I also had a moment of realizing that underneath the fears about my job was the fear that I wasn’t likeable (which related to job insecurity, hence my fears about the ‘whims’ of my boss).

Hi Adam,

Chrono has just posted a report (link) that he was experiencing a similar fear of not being likeable and found other feelings lurking beneath that. It may give you some helpful or even applicable pointers.

Instead of “sacrifice the things I feel that I’m protecting” you can instead put everything on a preference basis –

Richard: The ‘I’ that used to inhabit this body did everything possible that ‘I’ could do to blatantly imitate the actual in that ‘I’ endeavoured to be happy and harmless for as much as is humanly possible. This was achieved by putting everything on a ‘it doesn’t really matter’ basis. That is, ‘I’ would prefer people, things and events to be a particular way, but if it did not turn out like that … it did not really matter for it was only a preference. ‘I’ chose to no longer give other people – or the weather – the power to make ‘me’ angry … or irritated … or even peeved, if that was possible. (Richard, AF List, No. 7, 27 Jan 1999).

Richard: I did everything possible that ‘I’ could do to blatantly imitate the actual in that ‘I’ endeavoured to be happy and harmless for as much as is humanly possible. This was achieved by putting everything on a ‘it doesn’t really matter’ basis. That is, ‘I’ would prefer people, things and events to be a particular way, but if it did not turn out like that … it did not really matter for it was only a preference. ‘I’ chose to no longer give other people – or the weather – the power to make ‘me’ angry … or even irritated … or even peeved. (Richard, List B, No. 12a, 16 Jul 1998)

And instead of wondering why other people do perhaps not like you, you can find out if you like yourself and if not why not. Is there perhaps a bad feeling lurking in the dark that you want to keep hidden, hidden from yourself? Something which perhaps requires some bright light of awareness? Something you can do something about with sincere intent to be happy and harmless?

AdamH: Now that I am feeling better and contemplating your suggestion, I definitely think it has some validity. Once I started hijacking the naivete I started feeling insecure about it continuing, and started being oversensitive to other people’s reactions to me. This instantly created a cycle where I became more disingenuous trying to get people to like/ value me, which because it had the opposite effect eventually lead to me giving up in a state of self-pity. Anyways, I’m now just tuning into the ‘inherent’ value of being naive, rather than what it gets for me. I’m not quite there but I’m peering over at the state of ‘gay abandon’ and trying to work up the daring to get back to it and let things take care of themselves, let life live me, and give up on the careful control and manipulations. It’s still a little hard to believe everything won’t fall apart though. (link)

You see, you can’t make naiveté happen, you can only allow yourself to be more naïve, in this moment – it is something outside the domain of the ‘controller’. It happens when you allow life to happen, not have it ‘your’ way. Hence a good way to start is to put everything on a preference basis, give up control a little – and don’t expect everything to happen at once (like a big leap to “the state of ‘gay abandon’”) – that again would be the opposite of being naïve.

You can experiment when doing nothing in particular for a while, and not know what is going to happen next, feeling a bit foolish perhaps, that’s ok, then a bit more of that, allow the objections and recognize the silliness, then get back to feeling good. Just explore what happens without plans how it should turn out …

Cheers Vineeto

2 Likes

Yes I definitely have been seeing the connection between my fear of not being likeable with the knowledge that i have harmfulness hidden within me. The more I channel energy into happiness and harmlessness the less I feel like I have to fear from others, it leads to a positive reinforcement loop… whereas when I hide and ‘nurse’ harmful feelings the opposite happens.

I think this is a phenomena I’ve been aware of, but the recognition of what point in this ‘loop’ I can actually make changes is something that’s never fully sunk in. The point where I can actually make changes is in being happy and harmless… which brings me to some of the recent forum happenings that have inspired me to post again:

I find myself getting stuck into what Kub described with conditions to check off or actions to take that will lead to somehow receiving happy and harmlessness, as opposed to just being happy and harmless. It’s interesting how even in the very moment of trying to get back to feeling good I do this.

Last week some friends of my girlfriend came to visit who I’ve never fully gotten comfortable with, they still seem like ‘her friends’ not mine. In the moment I was (or told myself I was) trying so hard to be happy and harmless, all the while thinking to myself about how we didn’t really connect, how they were different from me, how nothing I was saying was ‘landing’, how nothing I was doing was ‘working’ to put them at ease or connect.

I was also watching the tightness in my chest, the hesitancy and nervousness in my words, the supressed resentment in my thoughts, thinking to myself ‘how do I fix this?’ Very much a case of not really seeing my feelings as being me, seeing my feelings instead as something that I “know better” than.

The difference between this and actually seeing that I am my feelings and choosing to be another way is huge experientially yet somehow hard for me to grasp conceptually. I think the key that helped me to grasp it was reading the above exchange between Kub and Vineeto, and recognizing how even in that moment where I thought I was trying to apply the actualism method, I was still within that ‘reward/punishment template’.

To be even more specific, I think the exact ‘realization’ which helped me switch over was to realize that I could actually choose to enjoy the experience right now and that would be the reward in and of itself, rather than having in mind the reward as the way that the relationship dynamic would improve if I dealt with the annoying feelings I was experiencing.

That realization led to coming directly face to face with my own objections to enjoying life in that situation, at which point I realized how I was being silly to have those objections because they were self-evidently making my life and everyone else’s life worse, and got back to feeling good. The path is not hard to find it’s just I don’t want to walk down it, but seeing this really clearly is often enough to change my mind, especially when the triviality of my highly specific reasons for not wanting to is illuminated.

1 Like

Hi Hunterad,

It’s so cool that these discussions are doing something beneficial, it’s actually such a wonderful thing that human beings can assist each other in this way.

Just to add from my recent experience to what you wrote in your post. I wrote the other day in my journal that I have been ushering myself towards enjoyment and appreciation… I really like this word in this context - to usher. It has the connotations of a gentle guiding towards something, of a helpful accompanying through a process etc. It’s for sure different to demanding, pushing etc.

I notice that when Richard or Vineeto or Geoffrey write, those words are intended to do exactly that, to usher fellow human beings towards discovering their own freedom, and ‘I’ can do something similar towards ‘myself’. That when things go awry ‘I’ can assist and guide ‘myself’ through it all in that same gentle and beneficial manner - always back towards enjoyment and appreciation.

It’s very nice to be nice to myself :smile:

3 Likes

Vineeto to JesusCarlos: Chrono has just posted a report (link) that he was experiencing a similar fear of not being likeable and found other feelings lurking beneath that. It may give you some helpful or even applicable pointers. (link)

AdamH: Yes I definitely have been seeing the connection between my fear of not being likeable with the knowledge that I have harmfulness hidden within me. The more I channel energy into happiness and harmlessness the less I feel like I have to fear from others, it leads to a positive reinforcement loop… whereas when I hide and ‘nurse’ harmful feelings the opposite happens.
I think this is a phenomena I’ve been aware of, but the recognition of what point in this ‘loop’ I can actually make changes is something that’s never fully sunk in. The point where I can actually make changes is in being happy and harmless …

Hi Adam,

This is excellent. Fully comprehending that you “can actually make changes” will give you the necessary interest, vitality and persistence to actually be happy and harmless.

AdamH: … which brings me to some of the recent forum happenings that have inspired me to post again:

Geoffrey: As long as you find yourself looking for the door that is tiny (the recipe, the formula, the secret sauce, the psychic gun, the pill, the trick), you’re nowhere near and should instead walk the path.
As long as you find the path narrow, arduous, vanishing, confusing, instead of wide and wondrous as it is, you’re not walking it, you are merely lost in the woods nearby – and should instead find it in yourself to take a first clear step in the right direction, such as making a commitment to happiness and harmlessness.
The door is wide as the universe, just as the path is by imitation.
When one knows what it is one wants, and when one knows what it is one must sacrifice, then only the sensible action remains. (link)

Kuba: Which is to say that at the core of it there is no pre-set list of conditions which ‘I’ have to tick off as the ‘doer’ before felicity and innocuity is granted to ‘me’ – this is completely the wrong paradigm. It pre-supposes that felicity and innocuity is something that is granted as an end result of some kind of deterministic domino effect, all the while ‘I’ remain passive, waiting. (link)

Kuba: So instead what happens is that ‘I’ choose to ‘be’ the felicitous and innocuous feelings instead of ‘being’ the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ feelings. Then ‘I’ am no longer operating from the back-seat, ‘I’ am directly and actively involved in how ‘I’ am experiencing this moment of being alive.
Of course as you mentioned this can only work if ‘I’ first fully acknowledge that ‘I’ am ‘my’ feelings, which means that no feelings can be repressed, suppressed or dissociated from. (link)

Vineeto to Kuba: You put it well – this is the difference between actively taken life into your hands and changing yourself fundamentally, rather than following the reward/ punishment template and therefore passively wait for an authority, ‘mother nature’, karma or some supernatural force/ entity to capriciously dish out the rewards. In fact, this is one big difference between the straight and narrow path and the wide and wondrous path. (link)

AdamH: I find myself getting stuck into what Kuba described with conditions to check off or actions to take that will lead to somehow receiving happy and harmlessness, as opposed to just being happy and harmless. It’s interesting how even in the very moment of trying to get back to feeling good I do this.

This is a marvellous selection of quotes and well worth revisiting. What you describe is a deeply ingrained pattern, instilled and reinforced from early childhood, through school and all the other socialisation processes. The best thing you can do is become aware of it instance by instance, nip this habitual approach in the bud and get back on the wide and wondrous path. Once you notice it you are no longer stuck.

AdamH: Last week some friends of my girlfriend came to visit who I’ve never fully gotten comfortable with, they still seem like ‘her friends’ not mine. In the moment I was (or told myself I was) trying so hard to be happy and harmless, all the while thinking to myself about how we didn’t really connect, how they were different from me, how nothing I was saying was ‘landing’, how nothing I was doing was ‘working’ to put them at ease or connect.
I was also watching the tightness in my chest, the hesitancy and nervousness in my words, the supressed resentment in my thoughts, thinking to myself ‘how do I fix this?’ Very much a case of not really seeing my feelings as being me, seeing my feelings instead as something that I “know better” than.

Well, firstly it is a case of not being friendly with yourself. When you become aware of what is affectively happening, pat yourself on the back for spotting it, and then it is much easier to get back to feeling good. Only then it’s worth looking at the cause of what diminished your feeling good.

AdamH: The difference between this and actually seeing that I am my feelings and choosing to be another way is huge experientially yet somehow hard for me to grasp conceptually. I think the key that helped me to grasp it was reading the above exchange between Kuba and Vineeto, and recognizing how even in that moment where I thought I was trying to apply the actualism method, I was still within that ‘reward/ punishment template’.

Yes it is, and as one correspondent once said, who had tantrum-size trouble with the actualism, once seen “it is remarkably easy”.

RESPONDENT: ‘It has taken me a hell of a long time to understand the difference between having feelings and being those feelings. Because I have not clearly understood this, I’ve never quite got the hang of paying attention to feelings without praise or blame, and without notions of innocence and culpability, right and wrong, etc getting in the way.
This makes things very interesting. The moment I regard my ‘self’ as ‘having’ a feeling, I’m split down the middle and there’s a secondary reaction on the part of the social identity (an urge to “do something” about the feeling, which in turn evokes more feelings, and so on). Conversely, if I recognise that I am the feeling, it most often dissolves into thin air – and usually pretty quickly too.
This is great. It’s especially helpful with regard to anger and frustration which have been two of my biggest hurdles to date. Previously, when I caught myself being angry, annoyed or frustrated, identifying and paying attention to this feeling would NOT cause it to disappear. On the contrary, the feeling and the awareness of myself as ‘having’ it would sometimes become like a microphone and amplifier locked into a screaming feedback loop.
I’m really pleased that this is no longer happening. It seems almost too easy’. [emphasis in original]. (Thursday 28/10/2004 6:55 PM AEST) (See Richard, AF List, No. 60g, 30 Oct 2005a).

AdamH: To be even more specific, I think the exact ‘realization’ which helped me switch over was to realize that I could actually choose to enjoy the experience right now and that would be the reward in and of itself, rather than having in mind the reward as the way that the relationship dynamic would improve if I dealt with the annoying feelings I was experiencing.
That realization led to coming directly face to face with my own objections to enjoying life in that situation, at which point I realized how I was being silly to have those objections because they were self-evidently making my life and everyone else’s life worse, and got back to feeling good. The path is not hard to find it’s just I don’t want to walk down it, but seeing this really clearly is often enough to change my mind, especially when the triviality of my highly specific reasons for not wanting to is illuminated.

Indeed, and once you find out that this was the only obstacle, you not wanting to enjoy life, it is really amusing and easy to redress, amend, readjust. It reminds me of Peter’s Virtual Freedom DVD (link) who reported having had a similar resistance to be happy and harmless.

And now that you discovered how easy it is there is no reason to make this the most important aim in your life.

Ain’t life wonderful.

Cheers Vineeto

2 Likes

Kuba: I notice that when Richard or Vineeto or Geoffrey write, those words are intended to do exactly that, to usher fellow human beings towards discovering their own freedom, and ‘I’ can do something similar towards ‘myself’. That when things go awry ‘I’ can assist and guide ‘myself’ through it all in that same gentle and beneficial manner – always back towards enjoyment and appreciation.
It’s very nice to be nice to myself. (link)

Hi Kuba,

While it is essential you be a friend to yourself, what ‘you’ ultimately do is ‘ushering yourself’ towards allowing pure intent to live you and let the ‘doer’, the ‘usherer’, step out of the way. Otherwise ‘you’ only will usher ‘yourself’ gently round in circles.

Thought I mention it.

Cheers Vineeto

Hi Vineeto,

Yes thank you this actually makes a lot of sense, I do notice though that being friends with myself in terms of getting back on track also makes it much easier to consider allowing myself to get out of the way.

It’s as you said recently that ‘I’ can be made into an ally in all this.

2 Likes

Yea, this makes sense, I have definitely been putting an emphasis on this lately, the closer i can get to really seeing how I am actually choosing to not enjoy and appreciate the closer i am to genuinely being able to choose to enjoy and appreciate. Even ‘ushering myself’ seems like it has some ‘separation’ in it but it’s closer than ‘forcing’ or ‘pushing’ for sure.

As an emphasis of my practice, this mostly manifests as intentionally not rushing the process of getting back to feeling good, going for quality not speed. It’s brought me face to face several times with more ‘conscious’ objections to feeling good, which is much better than the state of thinking that I want to feel good I just don’t know how to make it happen.

2 Likes

It’s never been more clear to me how continuing down this path does actually mean the end of me, and there have been flashes of ‘well in that case do I really want to do it?’ I think this is a good sign though for sure, and considering the madness and sadness in the world and even in smaller doses in my own life, it still seems like something I do want.

A slightly ‘muted’ version of the same stresses I’ve experienced for years in regards to work has been coming up again this week. A perspective on it I’ve never really had before though is also coming up. It’s clear how the stress is “me” inserting “myself” into events that don’t really need “me” to be there at all. I’m fighting against a flow of various forces that are in tension with eachother but also balanced. These forces are for example my department at work and another department competing for resources and control. It’s not a case of pacifism, but a case of a more clear-eyed perspective on the tension and seeing how I can pay lip service to it in a sensible way. When I do this, I am perhaps still an instrument of these forces to some degree, but a very ‘good-humored’ instrument that is always ready to lay my arms down when the situation allows. I’m not the one who continues to drive it through personal investment.

1 Like

Hi Hunterad,

I was thinking about something similar recently, how there is the option to remain an identity and continue to fix this and that and then there is the option to proceed towards actual freedom and eradicate the root cause of the issues. And I realised that this game of remaining an identity and chipping away is kind of like investing into something that gives progressively more diminishing returns.

It’s fascinating that we are in the pioneering stages of all this so things are shifting with each wave of actually free individuals. I can understand why ‘Peter’ and ‘Vineeto’ lived the in-control virtual freedom for a prolonged period, it was only Richard that had reached actual freedom at that point and he had to go through the hazardous route of enlightenment, the direct route was yet to be opened.

Geoffrey wrote that he never aimed for a virtual freedom, from the start he aimed for an actual freedom, that any virtual freedom happened en route.
It seems this is where we are at now - the opening of the direct route showed that proceeding towards actual freedom is completely safe, so now it seems with each new wave it is about demonstrating that it is easier than before.

It seems it is like Richard wrote, using the metaphor of the first people discovering new continents through long and perilous journeys and now the current people flying across in an air conditioned plane whilst being served delicious food, watching movies etc :smile:

I am getting inklings that indeed it no longer has to be perilous like it was for Richard, that it may be much easier than ‘we’ all believe it to be. And so it is investing into diminishing returns to continue to try to clean up ‘someone’ who can just as easily disappear leaving nothing dirty to have to clean up in the first place.

I am reminded now of what Geoffrey wrote, that he was surprised that people are not becoming actually free in droves, because of how easy the direct route is. I mean I was the one to make it into the hardest thing in the world, kind of because I thought it was meant to be like that. I was certainly inspired by reading what Richard went through, but it doesn’t mean that ‘I’ am traversing the same territory that ‘he’ was.

What exciting times, to demonstrate that it is way easier than considered before. And of course it is easier with each next person, even the fact that there is now a big handful of human beings on this planet walking around with no ‘being’ at all, and they are doing just fine haha!

3 Likes