I wanted to respond to this:
As my energy has shifted from needing-them-to-get-it, to a more naive I-don’t-know-what-will-happen, not afraid to say my piece, people have responded far differently, which has resulted in getting deeper into the details of actualism rather than getting ‘stuck’ in “I’m right/you’re wrong” fighting (as a dynamic involving both parties). This has meant that where in the past it would have been a dead-end/“I guess they’re not interested,” the likelihood of their own organic interest being triggered has increased considerably.
Even with that it’s a low number of people that will connect with it, but I can see that that component makes a huge difference.
Which does circle back to the naivete angle.
–
This has been my experience as well, I was able to feel most naive to begin with alone in nature, then I grew it in one on one encounters, then by myself not in nature, and now it is growing in group settings.
I think that varies depending on one’s predilections (some feel the most happy in groups), but either way there is in my experience another setting where the naivete has the most growth potential.
–
@Andrew @solvann We may be somewhat synced up on this issue, as I made a major naivete-related breakthrough with my partner yesterday. Here is a link to the write-up: