What I was wondering was also, why dig around in the trash trying to find something that could (but probably does not) describe a PCE, when the PCE has been so meticulously and wondrously described by Richard and other actualists.
It’s kind of like as an actualist trying to find some wisdom in the ‘tried and true’ ways, which actually is also this weird inclination I have seen and also indulged in myself - For example trying to find scientific support for the actualism method etc.
It’s like anything as long as ‘I’ can hang onto the ‘the known’ in some way or another.