I experience it primarily as a memory of the flavor of the PCE/actual world, which then I can access at any time. I can tell immediately when I am going away from it, and similarly when I remember to go towards it, it is familiar, and I can go in that direction. It is like a smell that I recognize.
Can you say more about what this lag usually looks like?
I think it is because if someone is acting like an idiot, to coddle them and be very soft with them (remember this is the prescribed christian/spiritual advice) is to give them free reign to continue to be an idiot for as long as they want to. Sometimes people need to be ‘shaken out of it’ as it were (another way of describing this: calling a spade a spade).
Also, it would be a bit different if Richard were going onto the street and haranguing passer-by in a similar manner, but this is in the context of email-lists expressly set up for those interested in understanding the human condition and possibilities therein. So now you have someone acting like an idiot and broadcasting their idiocy to all the other seekers as well as ‘clogging the airways.’
All of this behavior acts to delay or distract from the potential peace-on-earth, so you can see the utility in again being very direct.
I found an example from the Actualism site: Richard describes Noam Chomsky as the ‘wankasaurus of the century.’ This seems a bit out of line, especially coming from someone professing to ‘be’ peace and harmony, no? But here is his explanation:
The name-calling without substance came from (for example) the editorial departments of The New Yorker, The New York Times, and The Guardian (“The New Yorker called him ‘one of the greatest minds of the twentieth century’; The New York Times called him: ‘the most important intellectual alive’; The Guardian declared that he: ‘ranks with Marx, Shakespeare, and the Bible as one of the ten most quoted sources in the humanities’.”) and not this keyboard … do you really think I would write something, on a mailing list specifically set-up to discuss peace and harmony, I was unable to support?
For just one instance of Mr. Noam Chomsky’s contribution to global peace and harmony one needs look no further than, when the National Liberation Front was trying to take control of South Vietnam, him telling a forum in New York on December 15 1967 that [quote] ‘I don’t accept the view that we can just condemn the NLF terror, period, because it was so horrible. I think we really have to ask questions of comparative costs, ugly as that may sound. And if we are going to take a moral position on this – and I think we should – we have to ask both what the consequences were of using terror and not using terror. If it were true that the consequences of not using terror would be that the peasantry in Vietnam would continue to live in the state of the peasantry of the Philippines, then I think the use of terror would be justified’.
The all-up ‘comparative costs’ of the political terror unleashed under the leadership of Mr. Nguyen That Thanh (aka Ho Chi Min) – which terror Mr. Noam Chomsky rationalises as being justifiable – was of the magnitude of 1,670,000 citizens of Vietnam being murdered by their government.
Do you really want to pursue the topic of which one of us has ‘complacent blinkers’ on … or would this be an opportune moment to do an abrupt about turn and discuss what is on offer on The Actual Freedom Trust web site?
It is your call.
The original source includes additional links/sources as well.
You can see how the ‘harm’ done by ‘name-calling’ is completely eclipsed by the harm done by justifying millions murdered by their government (which behavior is celebrated by multiple newspapers of note!).
And again in the context that Richard had zero animosity behind such statements… they are descriptive statements of Chomsky’s actions.