Yes! Exactly, and I remember that it wasn´t very obvious or clear for them at the beggining, but thanks to your retro they were able to acknowledge it. If I’m not wrong, their answers also included my “second carrot” (humanity), wich, in my perspective, first comes in a more intelectual way until you experience it visceraly after touching naivete thanks to intimacy with some specific being in your life. But well, this can be different with each one.
True 
Yes! And I’m having a little trouble here, understanding more clearly the distinction between that sweetness and the “direction of love and its affectuos intimacy (due to a self-centric attractiveness towards feeling affectionate)”. Maybe a good paramether is to detect that sweetness doesn’t requiere a retribution, it’s all in itself, and love always require payment in back. Am I correct?
Lol! Don’t know if I get this one right (sometimes I have difficulties in the translation to spanish, my mother tongue), but it means something like lossing all fear or shame of being as one is and letting others see that, despite the risk of being classified as what in modern psychiatric terms means total narcissism? Of course I understand it doesn’t mean let passionate impulses run free across the meadow. It refers rather to allowing oneself to think about one’s own well-being in absolute terms, regardless of the desires or whims of others.
Thank you so much for the full quote. I didn’t know it before. It’s wonderful, especially considering how difficult it was for Richard to emerge from enlightenment.
And as always, thank you so much for your retro and support V. It is invaluable.