It’s an interesting point of view, and I think that in these cases one does not have to look for the best possible article (which we do not really know a priori how it can be, neither in substance nor in form -besides, it probably cannot exist because there is no way that only one article can satisfy the needs and conditions of all readers). But it is not necessary either: blogs allow to generate an unlimited number of articles on different topics, or on the same topic but from different points of view.
Why don’t you write TWO articles?
- One, exactly from the perspective and with the objective/target you propose in this last message
- The other, from the perspective proposed by @Srinath .
Of course, you don’t have to answer; it’s just another idea that you can discuss with Srinath privately.