No this is not a personal report
I just read this book and it was a really enlightening read:
I highly recommend sticking through it and reading the entire thing. Before reading it I thought that sociopaths were essentially âhopelessâ creatures, very cunning, devilish, that always manipulate, donât want the same things non-sociopaths want (like connection and understanding), massively more self-centered/selfish than usual, and are essentially a danger to society unless their selfish interests happen to align with what is productive.
After reading it, my understanding now is that sociopathy is more similar to autism/aspergerâs, in that itâs simply a different way that the brain functions. i.e. you have neurotypical people, then you have people on the autism spectrum, people with varying degrees of sociopathic traits, etc.
Not to say sociopathy is similar to autism per se, just that the cause of the other-ness is the same: their brains work differently.
And it was interesting that she wanted the same as neurotypical people in terms of love, connection, etc. She just didnât understanding it from the usual perspective, and it took her some time and experience to figure it out.
Also as a common critique/objection of actual freedom is that you would be a sociopath without feelings, it was instructive to read a diagnosed psycopathâs depiction of their inner world, how vastly different it is from a PCE, and it was informative to see her write that she never met a sociopath that would say they donât have feelings.
One common trait of sociopaths is that they donât experience negative emotions in the same way as neurotypicals do. They still occur, but they are massively shuttered off, and essentially requires a conscious act of will to observe it or feel it⌠and why would you? This combined with an apparently instinctive impulsiveness and propensity to manipulate, makes a really powerful negative cocktail that can spiral out of control - as it appears to do for many. The main problem though seems to be that neurotypicals donât know what to do with such a person. Moral judgement simply doesnât work, it is completely alien to the sociopaths because they simply donât feel it. They can figure out what it means for other people but only by observing etc. But in the book essentially the author comes to the conclusion - as many sociopaths do apparently - that itâs logically beneficial to be a productive member of society⌠itâs good for everyone and good for you too. So itâs not that they canât be sensible⌠itâs that they perhaps have a harder time getting there, and a rockier path.
Anyway, my brief take-aways donât do it full justice, but it was quite intriguing!