@Andrew Since you haven’t responded to my private message at all, I will publicly ask you to stop using my real name anywhere here on this forum henceforth. You used the real name here; I asked you to edit it in a private message, which you seem to have ignored and then used the name yet again in another comment. I had to ask Claudiu to edit both of your posts above where you used it. If someone is using an pseudonym, it is basic consideration to not violate their privacy.
In regards to the following:
What I’m interested in here is sincere and clear communication, not “more chats” or to “talk more”.
I would suggest you get better at “this format”, because the problem is certainly not the format per se. The format, textual communication, is in fact quite beneficial for discussing actualism, and Richard says as much. You can re-read this very conversation, as many times as you need to, and then learn from your mistakes. Instead of blaming “this format”, find out why you are prone to “point making” instead of taking others at face value and responding to their words.
To help you, I’ll give you one starting point (the other one’s related to PCE), which is also beneficial to restore the focus back to the topic itself:
Syd: It is simply impossible to be caring and considerate of women, in a genuine sense, as long as this affectional intimacy remains the main spanner in the works.
Andrew: Anyway, to your point of it is “impossible to be caring and considerate of women”. This is simply another variation of “it’s impossible to change human nature” [..]
For starters, note how you took what I said out of context, missing the very important qualifier highlighted in yellow above. When this context of affectional intimacy was further explained to you in a reply, you ignored it once again and went on yet another round promoting your particular version of ‘caring’ (concomitant to the ironic unfolding of its behavioural manifestation in realtime).
My standards for engaging someone here is very simple: they need to, at minimum, care enough to respond directly to what I actually write or say.