quoting either Tate or Musk isn’t going to make the point I think you wanted to make! both are without a doubt well outside ‘normal’, with definite malignant personalities, that I would not be surprised are clinical cluster B’s.
Anyway, to your point of it is “impossible to be caring and considerate of women”. This is simply another variation of “it’s impossible to change human nature”. The clause you added “in a genuine sense” was moralizing in an “actualist way”. There is no reason that we cannot be caring in considerate of women to an increasing extent, except for the belief that it is “impossible”. This is a belief, which I was also holding in general. The “impossible to change instinctual passions” variation.
It’s very possible to be more and more caring, as in considerate to all and sundry. It’s a choice.