So again, something is coming in from left field.
Something about how i construe actualism.
This is my world. No ‘squotes’, no need for analysis or definition. This world i perceive in whatever way i perceive it is the world i am encouraged to “enjoy and appreciate”.
I have said it before, over the last decade many times, but for me there was always something very “Christian” about the way i construed actualism.
‘self’ = bad, evil, the devil.
“actual” = good, holy, god.
I always had a hard time reading Richard talk about the ‘self’ being rotten.
I think i would have benefited greatly being able to live in proximity of other actualists, and actually free people. What i construed was never the point.
The discussion about what is actual, what is real, what is an illusion, (if illusion is even a thing), how anything exists etc, is really beside the point.
The point is; whatever world this is, however it exists or doesn’t, is the world i am encouraged to enjoy, appreciate, and otherwise feel good in. In the most happy and harmless way possible.
If i ever actually manage to have a definitive PCE, it will be because i no longer construe this as some “good vs evil” battle, when i no longer see myself on either side. When i stop seeing this as something i must do out of some duty, and the sensibility of continuous enjoyment is my 100% goal.