Milito’s Journal

[Kub933]

@milito.paz

In actual freedom there is no one that you cannot have a fruitful/enjoyable discussion with. Every time metaphysical terminology is used by someone you are engaging with you can delve into the rabbit hole with the person you are talking to and get down to the fact they are unknowingly referring to and aren’t seeing clearly. You can always bring clarity to any exchange. Absolutely any! It is fun talking to religious folk, political folk, sports folk etc. There are only facts! It is impossible to not be talking about facts. There is only a spectrum ranging from distorted perception of the facts and unmediated perception of the facts.

Ah nice! I had inklings that this was the case, this is exactly what I was writing about here :

Kub933's Journal

Ok so a few more things I can see so far is that there are many things I care about as an identity for example to be respected by others. When I look at this caring without any morality though it quickly becomes clear that there is something underneath the respect, maybe I want others to hold me in good esteem, then I go even underneath that and find something more pure, that actually I want to relate to others amicably. Then if I go all the way I see that what I actually want is what the PCE de…

@milito.paz

I used to have the habit of when not hearing or understanding someone just nodding or saying “oh yeah” or “right” instead of telling them that I didn’t understand and asking them to repeat/clarify/amplify.

Nice, this is another thing that I can relate to, at some point I noticed this habit and I thought that it is the opposite of caring, that even though it might irritate people to repeat themselves, if I do genuinely care about what they have to say then I cannot just nod away.

@milito.paz

There was the thought that as the number of arbitrary identities or identifiers increases, there is greater opportunity to argue for the elimination of identity altogether.

This is something that I wondered about also. Specifically what Gen Z did, it seems they took what was a small and rigid handful of available identities and exploded them into hundreds of possible and completely contradictory identifications. No wonder a lot of them are an anxious bunch as none of it can form any kind of coherent whole. But still that intention was there to find another way that is not so rigid, perhaps just misinformed because the answer is not to split identity x1000 but rather to demolish it altogether.