Hi Vineeto, and Claudiu 
,
So I have been looking into all this what has been discussed, relating to no longer having anything to hide, so that naïveté can flourish.
I can see that no longer having anything to hide is essentially to have levelled the maze which consisted of ‘my’ subterfuge.
But then there is something else… It is not do with no longer hiding as such, rather it is to do with ceasing ‘surviving’. Which is to say that to ‘be’ naïveté and thus to set the actualism process in motion is to agree to cease the instinctual ‘action’ of ‘surviving’, which is more like the very thrust of ‘me’ as an entity.
It looks to me that to step through the boundary, past which the actualism process is in motion, is to have decided, deep down, to cease ‘surviving’.
Basically this ‘action’ of ‘surviving’ and naïveté are oil and water, and to give way to naïveté fully is to abandon ‘surviving’.