Kub933's Journal

Hi John,

I am not sure how well I can describe the difference between the ‘do-er’ and ‘be-er’ but Hunterad’s post from yesterday does quite a good job of describing the MO of the ‘do-er’ :

So the ‘do-er’ is the little agent ‘inside’ with ‘his’ various sophisticated plans and schemes, the one apparently in charge of life, the one carrying the burden of “keeping it all together” etc. What the ‘do-er’ eventually realises is that like Hunterad described - ‘he’ is just spinning around in circles and it is all for nought.

Then with sufficient abandon the ‘do-er’ can take a risk and instead of remaining in control ‘he’ can step back and allow life to happen of it’s own accord and thus make way for the naive ‘be-er’ to Iive without the effort and without the control. This is as far as I have got experientially :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

3 Likes