Hi Vineeto,
I deleted the post, as it was very childish. Basically, I was objecting to something, and demanding someone else solve the “problem “ I imagined.
As you saw fit to respond anyway, I will do my best to be constructive and explore what it is I wanted “solved”.
I have for a while suspected that Actualism is operating on a “direct pointing “ type of psychic effect. This is a reference to Zen, where the student is made, sometimes with violence, to “see” some essential truth. I experienced this myself in an online environment once. Participants are instructed repeatedly “look! There is no self!” In various ways. The participants want to achieve what is being instructed, and it does work, to a point. The instruction itself is faulty in that method, as it bypasses the obvious; I am a self. At best it “peaks” at a “no self” experience, but won’t sustain it.
We have, over many years, in various forums discussed the “at work” environment.
It is a fact that no one as yet, has become “officially” actually free working a corporate job, in an office building, surrounded by modern working relationships.
I say “officially “ as Craig did achieve that, by his report, but my understanding is that he is not regarded as actually free by yourself.
Everyone so far, has been in an “alternative “ scenario. Self employed, otherwise “off the beaten track”.
Quoting Richard’s experience, while also knowing that an artist on his own farm is a far cry from a corporate office, still leaves the assertion that being affectively aware, without cognitive engagement, in unproven.
Unless Craig is Actually Free.
Regards
Andrew