Greetings to all

[claudiu]

Dear whoever-you-are,

@PWR

Now, pure intent is no longer necessary because all traces of resistance (objections created by an intellect hijacked by the ego) have been eliminated from this nervous system.

@Shashank

You said that pure intent is not necessary now, so do you not experience it anymore or you have access to it but its not necessary ?

@PWR

Why would I need pure intent now?

Thank you for confirming, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that you are not actually free from the human condition, as depicted on the Actual Freedom Trust website, with meticulous attention paid to detail and accuracy of reporting.

You are not the first one to falsely claim (either wilfully as part of a trolling campaign to prevent the spread of peace-on-earth, or ignorantly from not knowing that of which you speak yet which nevertheless works towards that same prevention-of-peace-on-earth aim) to be actually free and to thus misunderstand what pure intent is. Tarin (along with the other ‘affers’ at the time) made the same mistake in 2010:

• [Tarin]: (…) by the way, not being an identity, i don’t experience pure intent (it has been fulfilled/ been extinguished). [emphasis added]
(RE: In preparation for the Actual Freedom thread - Discussion - www.dharmaoverground.org).

The key point, of course, is that to be actually free from the human condition is to be that pure intent, personified:

[Richard]: And, speaking of which, the directors of The Actual Freedom Trust hereby recommend, publicly, that Tarin taps into that palpable life-force, that actually occurring stream of benevolence and benignity, which originates in the vast and utter stillness that is the essential character of the universe itself, because to be actually free from the human condition is to be that pure intent … as in, to be that benevolence and benignity as a flesh-and-blood body only. [original emphasis]

Put succinctly: there is no other way, than to be that, because there is no other actual freedom from the human condition (than being that) [emphasis added]. [link]

As there is no way that someone who is pure intent personified (which is the only way to be actually free from the human condition) would state that pure intent is no longer necessary and rhetorically ask why they would need it now, there is only one possible conclusion to make, to wit: that you are not that, and thus are not actually free.

(The entire announcement is well worth reading for anyone for whom the above quotes alone are not sufficient. It is notable to add that Tarin, along with all the other affers, one by one eventually fully renounced their claims of having ever been actually free from the human condition.)

---

Your entire reason for posting here is predicated upon this crucial point – namely, that you are actually free. All the rest follows from that – namely, that you’ve discovered a new method to do it (or rather a recipe with which to make new methods), that this is an improvement over using the actualism method (ie that it’s a better alternative for some), that there are multiple ways to become actually free, etc. As an example only:

@PWR

It is possible to improve any method without necessarily adding anything to it, taking anything away from it, or changing anything about it. In other words, just find a new method instead of reforming the old one. […]

@edzd

So to be clear, you devised a new method specifically for yourself and it has led to an actual freedom from the human condition?

Yes and I called this new method because of its basic characteristic, a “path WITHOUT resistance”. […] My contribution is […] to reveal that there are other ways to reach the top of the same mountain (an allegory).

Richard discovered a remarkably effective and efficient way to distinguish facts from fiction, theories, beliefs, misinformation, etc.:

RICHARD: What I have found, more often than not, in any area of research I have ever looked into is that not only are facts rather few and far between but it is mainly the proposition which gets most of the attention … so much so that I have oft-times figuratively likened such theses to an inverted pyramid (one standing on its apex) where a judicious pulling-out of its intuited/ imagined capstone results in the teetering edifice painstakingly constructed thereupon ignominiously tumbling down.

It is all so glaringly obvious when one twigs to what to look for – the factual basis of the hypothesis or theory/the basic premise of the argument or proposition – and it saves wading through a lot of quite often well-written but fatally-flawed articles trying to make sense of something which can never make sense”. [link]

The “capstone” here is, of course, your claim to be actually free from the human condition.

As this claim fails, the entire edifice comes crumbling down, and there is therefore no need to engage any further with specific points, diversions, distractions, tactics, misinformations, paranoias, misunderstandings, and etc. etc., that permeate every one of your posts.

If you have been trolling this whole time: the jig is up.

If you genuinely believe you are actually free, and are just confused: I do encourage you to read all the above carefully, read the announcement in full, and gain an understanding of what pure intent actually is (first an intellectual one, just enough to see that what you call “pure intent” is nothing of the sort, which will open you up to the possibility to actually find it; and then later an experiential one) as you are going to need it if you ever want to pull yourself out of the bizarre psychic hole you have managed to put yourself in. And if this is indeed what you have done: it may very well have been a well-intentioned but ultimately misguided endeavour. If so, there’s no need to beat yourself up about it… now you are presented with an opportunity to correct course and attain to that which you actually want, a genuine actual freedom from the human condition, rather than the faux imitation you find yourself in due to various missteps you have made over the years.

Cheers and best regards,
Claudiu

P.S. It should be “Saúde” not “Salud”, eh?