Greetings to all

[Shashank]

Be warned everyone because the pure intent of PWR is a palpable strife force, a genuinely occulting stream of anonymity and aggression, which occurs in the vast silliness of the anastasis scared psyche

I’m feeling a bit poetic today

[Vineeto]

Thank you Shashank, for the hearty laugh.

Cheers Vineeto

[edzd]

@PWR

Since there’s no point in politely asking to accept my anonymity and not track my IP (shame on you, Claudus) in the face of the threat of revealing my private address and compromising my security…

@PWR

I am a married man with no children, 51 years old. I was born and live in a certain Western nation with a Catholic majority and Iberian colonization. I don’t have a college degree, and I taught myself English so I could travel and study abroad.

@PWR

Good afternoon, everyone, it’s a rainy morning here where I am and it must be an equally rainy morning or evening somewhere on this big planet.

Did Cladus track your IP? Have I missed that part of this thread? (I’m open to this possibility)

I kind of find your warning of anastasia to be humorous in light of the information you’re willing to volunteer. I fail to see how you’re different from Richard aside from the fact that you’re unwilling to divulge your first name. Perhaps this is a big deal when it comes to anastasia; I don’t know it’s laws.

Do you feel like you may have put yourself at a health risk by participating in this thread? Anastasia seems like a serious vulnerability.

Is it a matter of popularity?

[PWR]

Good day, Claudius (although many of you continue to refuse to accept a simple acronym, I will go back to calling you by the name you prefer).

If you are genuinely interested in my answers, and in understanding a little more about my discoveries over the past 13 years, I extend my invitation to you and will answer any sincere questions you send to the email pathwithoutresistance@proton.me
Please know in advance that I will keep our correspondence confidential, a kindness that you may return if you so wish.

Anonymously, but always sincerely, at your disposal,
PWR

[PWR]

Good day, edzd.

“Did Cladus track your IP? Have I missed that part of this thread? (I’m open to this possibility)”
— I suggest you should ask Claudius directly why and how he tracked my IP.

“Do you feel like you may have put yourself at a health risk by participating in this thread? Anastasia seems like a serious vulnerability.”
— My health and safety are not at risk, because no one here knows me personally, and they don’t even know my full name or home address. Anastasis is not the kryptonite of an actually free man or woman, it is just a phenomenon of psychic origin (that is, coming from the strong and concentrated intentions and emotions of human beings with an intact psyche) that in the past has been confused with vampirism and other techniques of draining physical and mental vigor. It is not a question of believing or doubting, but of investigating for yourself (something I did voluntarily by analyzing the biographies of celebrities, enlightened gurus and anti-gurus, and that of Richard, the first to completely extirpate the psyche from his organism). I have already considered the possibility of anastasis being a nocebo effect, but how can we explain the deterioration of the health of people who never suspected they were being psychically attacked? In any case, more research is still needed on this phenomenon. Discovering and unraveling is part of having a Big Plan before, during and after having learned and acquired the new consciousness free of the ego and the psyche.

“Is it a matter of popularity?”
— Banksy is enormously popular in the artistic world, but remains anonymous (to the masses). However, Basquiat and a number of other modern and contemporary artists and celebrities lost their health quickly and died very early. Anyway, even without a psyche to affect and/or be affected by another, I decided not to take any risks and also not to put other people’s health at risk. Maybe I’m wrong (no one is infallible), in any case, I keep my seatbelt fastened during the flight. In the future, others will also delve deeper into this phenomenon and we will have more answers.

[claudiu]

G’day Petrified Wily Retreater,

@PWR

If you are genuinely interested in my answers, and in understanding a little more about my discoveries over the past 13 years, I extend my invitation to you and will answer any sincere questions you send to the email pathwithoutresistance@proton.me
Please know in advance that I will keep our correspondence confidential, a kindness that you may return if you so wish.

I am genuinely interested in the answer to my latest question:

@claudiu

Question: At this point I just have to stop and ask (and this is a genuine question): why on earth do you claim to be actually free, as in, experiencing the same actual freedom that Richard did and Vineeto, Peter, Geoffrey, Srinath, etc. do?

You claim “pure intent” is just a “poetic metaphor” and that it’s an incorrect view or concept to say that the universe (i.e. actuality) actually exists. Actuality is literally the place where actually free people live!

It sounds like you are experiencing some sort of condition that is just something totally different than actual freedom! Nothing you have written here indicates that you are experiencing the same thing. On what basis have you ascertained yourself to be experiencing the same thing?

If you are just straightforward and describe yourself as having reached some other end-goal that you think is more valuable than actual freedom, you can just go ahead and say that, and everyone will be far better informed and there will be no misleading. Instead you mingle words and mash concepts and attempt to mislead your fellow human beings. Why do this?

I don’t have any interest in a private correspondence about it at this time.

Regards,
Claudiu

[PWR]

Dear edzd,

If you are interested in delving deeper into this topic of the electromagnetic waves that the human body emits and captures (the law of reciprocity in antenna theory), I recommend starting with the book The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life (1985) by Becker and Gary Selden.
Every cell in the body is a miniature transmitter/receiver.
Scientific literature on this topic is scarce for obvious reasons.
Of course the field was full of foo foo gurus at the time and even today you know with their practices of “earthing“ and the use of Schumann resonances, etc.
To be clear, there’s a difference between Science and Technology, between trial and error, the experimenting, and with Science, which is really not to know, but to explain and understand.
As I responded earlier today in private to _________ (name withheld):

“As for Ms. Barret and the other neuroscientists, biologists, and writers on the list I recommended in my first post on Discuss.Actualism.Online (DAO), read their works cum grano salis, because each author has their own agenda and bias.
The AF website has valuable information that helped me a lot in the beginning of my research and testing. I see no problem in you continuing to study Richard’s articles and correspondence. Contrary to what the DAO moderators accuse me of, I am all for reading with eyes wide open as many articles and correspondence archived on that pioneering site as possible.”

Just don’t allow this reading to interfere with your learning and acquisition of actual freedom. Discarding everything that the ego reuses to go unnoticed is vital, but never allow your intellect to lose its edge.
Now one last request: if you have any further questions or concerns for me, please send an email directly to pathwithoutresistance@proton.me
From now on I will only respond to messages sent to it (with rare exceptions, if necessary).

Thank you for your attention,

PWR

[roy]

Good day, everyone I’ve been following this messy thread too

---

@claudiu

P.S. It should be “Saúde” not “Salud”, eh?

I want to start by saying that I was also surprised when portuguese words (instead of spanish) started to be used to greet and say goodbye to @PWR. My guess is that, at some point, @PWR forgot to turn on their VPN, and @claudiu noticed that. If my guess is correct, I don’t think that’s right, because people should have the right to their privacy. I also find it quite silly not to address people by the nickname they chose. Anyway… just my two cents.

---

I have to admit that I struggle to understand the use of the term “pure intent” to describe what is experienced during a PCE. [… Mod. Note: Moved to What is pure intent?]

[PWR]

Is everything the “I” says a lie?

Or, to put it another way: The following sentence is true. The previous sentence is a lie. How about this one? This sentence is false. If it is true that it is false, then it is false. If it is false that it is false, then it is true.
Either way, it is a contradiction. It is called the Liar’s Paradox.
Father Universe and Mother Nature have no such paradoxes.
Formal logic is a trap. These derivational systems of inference are man-made systems that are often used to deceive the gullible. Don’t fall into this kind of trap. If you agree with the premise(s), then you must agree with the conclusion. But wait! You don’t have to agree with the premises.
Someone once told me this:
P1: Cells are invisible to the naked eye; P2: Humans are made of cells.
C: Humans are invisible to the naked eye…
Ha! Not all cells are invisible to the naked eye. If we’re talking about humans, an ovule can be seen with the naked eye. The yolk of a chicken egg is a single haploid cell, and there are single-celled organisms like paramecium and algae that can be seen with the naked eye. Now, of course, she was referring to cells on the outside of the human body, and her point was that we don’t have to accept the premises.
If we agree with the rules of formal logic or tautological systems like mathematics, for example, the conclusions are built right into the system. We agree that “two” “plus” “two” “equals” (and therefore) “four.” Well, that’s not true in all number systems. In base 3, 2+2=11. So it’s not universally true that 2+2=4, is it? It’s only proven factually or logically valid based on the system being used. There are really no “truths” and “facts,” only man-made opinions.
The actual world has no man-made rules or paradoxes. For example, things like the paradox of light are absurd. How can an object (particle) also be a concept (wave)? It cannot. There is no duality or paradox in the actual world, only misunderstandings of men with their constant reifications.
For all this, up to the present moment, there is the method of actualism proposed by Richard and that of the path without resistance discovered by “me”. Even though each has different premises and techniques, both share the same goal.
And this is simply wonderful!
On the path without resistance you learn and acquire a new consciousness free of subjective selves in a similar way as the ancient consciousness of a subjective self was learned by our ancestors in childhood and successively retransmitted. However, the language for this unlearning of the old mentality and the learning and acquisition of a new pure consciousness is not limited to that of dictionaries, and also involves the language of the body and the union of the senses at the root of the universal pure consciousness experiences.
May other new methodologies flourish in this and the coming years, ever more refined, until an anonymous network of actually free and safely operating men and women quietly dismantles this great cult called “Humanity” from the inside out.

Sincerely,

PWR

[claudiu]

@PWR

From now on I will only respond to messages sent to it (with rare exceptions, if necessary).

Well that didn’t last long