Be warned everyone because the pure intent of PWR is a palpable strife force, a genuinely occulting stream of anonymity and aggression, which occurs in the vast silliness of the anastasis scared psyche
I’m feeling a bit poetic today 
8 Likes
Thank you Shashank, for the hearty laugh.
Cheers Vineeto
2 Likes
Did Cladus track your IP? Have I missed that part of this thread? (I’m open to this possibility)
I kind of find your warning of anastasia to be humorous in light of the information you’re willing to volunteer. I fail to see how you’re different from Richard aside from the fact that you’re unwilling to divulge your first name. Perhaps this is a big deal when it comes to anastasia; I don’t know it’s laws.
Do you feel like you may have put yourself at a health risk by participating in this thread? Anastasia seems like a serious vulnerability.
Is it a matter of popularity?
Good day, Claudius (although many of you continue to refuse to accept a simple acronym, I will go back to calling you by the name you prefer).
If you are genuinely interested in my answers, and in understanding a little more about my discoveries over the past 13 years, I extend my invitation to you and will answer any sincere questions you send to the email pathwithoutresistance@proton.me
Please know in advance that I will keep our correspondence confidential, a kindness that you may return if you so wish.
Anonymously, but always sincerely, at your disposal,
PWR
Good day, edzd.
“Did Cladus track your IP? Have I missed that part of this thread? (I’m open to this possibility)”
— I suggest you should ask Claudius directly why and how he tracked my IP.
“Do you feel like you may have put yourself at a health risk by participating in this thread? Anastasia seems like a serious vulnerability.”
— My health and safety are not at risk, because no one here knows me personally, and they don’t even know my full name or home address. Anastasis is not the kryptonite of an actually free man or woman, it is just a phenomenon of psychic origin (that is, coming from the strong and concentrated intentions and emotions of human beings with an intact psyche) that in the past has been confused with vampirism and other techniques of draining physical and mental vigor. It is not a question of believing or doubting, but of investigating for yourself (something I did voluntarily by analyzing the biographies of celebrities, enlightened gurus and anti-gurus, and that of Richard, the first to completely extirpate the psyche from his organism). I have already considered the possibility of anastasis being a nocebo effect, but how can we explain the deterioration of the health of people who never suspected they were being psychically attacked? In any case, more research is still needed on this phenomenon. Discovering and unraveling is part of having a Big Plan before, during and after having learned and acquired the new consciousness free of the ego and the psyche.
“Is it a matter of popularity?”
— Banksy is enormously popular in the artistic world, but remains anonymous (to the masses). However, Basquiat and a number of other modern and contemporary artists and celebrities lost their health quickly and died very early. Anyway, even without a psyche to affect and/or be affected by another, I decided not to take any risks and also not to put other people’s health at risk. Maybe I’m wrong (no one is infallible), in any case, I keep my seatbelt fastened during the flight. In the future, others will also delve deeper into this phenomenon and we will have more answers.
G’day Petrified Wily Retreater,
I am genuinely interested in the answer to my latest question:
I don’t have any interest in a private correspondence about it at this time.
Regards,
Claudiu
Dear edzd,
If you are interested in delving deeper into this topic of the electromagnetic waves that the human body emits and captures (the law of reciprocity in antenna theory), I recommend starting with the book The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life (1985) by Becker and Gary Selden.
Every cell in the body is a miniature transmitter/receiver.
Scientific literature on this topic is scarce for obvious reasons.
Of course the field was full of foo foo gurus at the time and even today you know with their practices of “earthing“ and the use of Schumann resonances, etc.
To be clear, there’s a difference between Science and Technology, between trial and error, the experimenting, and with Science, which is really not to know, but to explain and understand.
As I responded earlier today in private to _________ (name withheld):
“As for Ms. Barret and the other neuroscientists, biologists, and writers on the list I recommended in my first post on Discuss.Actualism.Online (DAO), read their works cum grano salis, because each author has their own agenda and bias.
The AF website has valuable information that helped me a lot in the beginning of my research and testing. I see no problem in you continuing to study Richard’s articles and correspondence. Contrary to what the DAO moderators accuse me of, I am all for reading with eyes wide open as many articles and correspondence archived on that pioneering site as possible.”
Just don’t allow this reading to interfere with your learning and acquisition of actual freedom. Discarding everything that the ego reuses to go unnoticed is vital, but never allow your intellect to lose its edge.
Now one last request: if you have any further questions or concerns for me, please send an email directly to pathwithoutresistance@proton.me
From now on I will only respond to messages sent to it (with rare exceptions, if necessary).
Thank you for your attention,
PWR
Good day, everyone 
I’ve been following this messy thread too 
I want to start by saying that I was also surprised when portuguese words (instead of spanish) started to be used to greet and say goodbye to @PWR. My guess is that, at some point, @PWR forgot to turn on their VPN, and @claudiu noticed that. If my guess is correct, I don’t think that’s right, because people should have the right to their privacy. I also find it quite silly not to address people by the nickname they chose. Anyway… just my two cents.
I have to admit that I struggle to understand the use of the term “pure intent” to describe what is experienced during a PCE. [… Mod. Note: Moved to What is pure intent?]
1 Like
Is everything the “I” says a lie?
Or, to put it another way: The following sentence is true. The previous sentence is a lie. How about this one? This sentence is false. If it is true that it is false, then it is false. If it is false that it is false, then it is true.
Either way, it is a contradiction. It is called the Liar’s Paradox.
Father Universe and Mother Nature have no such paradoxes.
Formal logic is a trap. These derivational systems of inference are man-made systems that are often used to deceive the gullible. Don’t fall into this kind of trap. If you agree with the premise(s), then you must agree with the conclusion. But wait! You don’t have to agree with the premises.
Someone once told me this:
P1: Cells are invisible to the naked eye; P2: Humans are made of cells.
C: Humans are invisible to the naked eye…
Ha! Not all cells are invisible to the naked eye. If we’re talking about humans, an ovule can be seen with the naked eye. The yolk of a chicken egg is a single haploid cell, and there are single-celled organisms like paramecium and algae that can be seen with the naked eye. Now, of course, she was referring to cells on the outside of the human body, and her point was that we don’t have to accept the premises.
If we agree with the rules of formal logic or tautological systems like mathematics, for example, the conclusions are built right into the system. We agree that “two” “plus” “two” “equals” (and therefore) “four.” Well, that’s not true in all number systems. In base 3, 2+2=11. So it’s not universally true that 2+2=4, is it? It’s only proven factually or logically valid based on the system being used. There are really no “truths” and “facts,” only man-made opinions.
The actual world has no man-made rules or paradoxes. For example, things like the paradox of light are absurd. How can an object (particle) also be a concept (wave)? It cannot. There is no duality or paradox in the actual world, only misunderstandings of men with their constant reifications.
For all this, up to the present moment, there is the method of actualism proposed by Richard and that of the path without resistance discovered by “me”. Even though each has different premises and techniques, both share the same goal.
And this is simply wonderful!
On the path without resistance you learn and acquire a new consciousness free of subjective selves in a similar way as the ancient consciousness of a subjective self was learned by our ancestors in childhood and successively retransmitted. However, the language for this unlearning of the old mentality and the learning and acquisition of a new pure consciousness is not limited to that of dictionaries, and also involves the language of the body and the union of the senses at the root of the universal pure consciousness experiences.
May other new methodologies flourish in this and the coming years, ever more refined, until an anonymous network of actually free and safely operating men and women quietly dismantles this great cult called “Humanity” from the inside out.
Sincerely,
PWR
Well that didn’t last long 
16 posts were merged into an existing topic: What is pure intent?
Good day, DAO members,
For those who don’t know me yet, my “introduction” and “experience-report” might be helpful.
Below is a brief email correspondence that I had from March 31, 2025 to April 2, 2025 with one of the members of this forum who allowed me to share our messages here and whose nickname will be kept anonymous as I have requested (and which fortunately had already been considered by this member as well).
As the questions from “H” (nickname withheld) were well-written and very pertinent, I hope they will be useful to everyone in similar situations.
Staying on the “plateau” is no longer an option!
Warm regards,
PWR
March 31, 2025
Hello PWR,
Hope you’re doing well. I am part of the actualism forum, and I’d like to know more about the Path Without Resistance. I am currently reading Lisa Feldman Barret’s book to understand her view on how emotions are created, and I find it quite fascinating. Could you give me tips on how to apply this to get rid of ‘me’?
Also, could you tell me more about your own process of making a method to free yourself from the human condition, and about how you experience life now? I’m very interested in all I can learn about the PWR.
Thank you very much.
H.
March 31, 2025
Greetings, H.
Nice nickname!
I’m safe and sound, thank you.
As for Ms. Barret and the other neuroscientists, biologists, and writers on the list I recommended in my first post on Discuss.Actualism.Online (DAO), read their works cum grano salis, because each author has their own agenda and bias.
The AF website has valuable information that helped me a lot in the beginning of my research and testing. I see no problem in you continuing to study Richard’s articles and correspondence. Contrary to what the DAO moderators accuse me of, I am all for reading with eyes wide open as many articles and correspondence archived on that pioneering site as possible.
You wrote that you are interested in learning more about the method of the path without resistance, but you did not explain why you are interested. Could you explain the reasons that motivated you to become interested in the path without resistance?
I look forward to your feedback.
Sincerely,
PWR, or you can just call me Pi.
March 31, 2025
Thanks for the prompt answer, Pi!
My interest in the path without resistance stems from my desire to stop suffering. It’s the same reason why I first got interested in spirituality, and then, in actualism. I am in no way dogmatic by nature, so I’m always curious about more effective ways of becoming actually free. I’ve had PCEs in the past (although I haven’t had one for at least two years now, maybe more) and since then I’ve been reading about actualism and doing my best to apply the method (enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive).
Since I haven’t had any PCEs for so long, I kind of feel I am at a plateau. If there’s a way to make progress, I’d like to hear about it. That’s why I’m very much interested in your experience, and the method you created for yourself.
Sincerely,
H.
April 1, 2025
Good day, H.
There are two types of suffering: physical and psychological.
There can be many causes for physical suffering, and most of them can be treated and remedied or endured. On the other hand, normotic psychological suffering has only one cause: the cluster of identities that make up the ego.
The body no longer needs a self, an ego, an “I”.
This imaginary “I” has become redundant and burdensome for brain functions, causing enormous distress to the nervous system.
This distress is psychological suffering affecting the physical body in a process of chronic deterioration.
And no one deserves such a fate.
The solution I found after ten years of investigating this and other related topics was even simpler:
What was sustaining this legion of identities and preventing the body’s natural balance were “my” unresolved objections.
No objections, no resistance.
The path is always open, only “you” are the barrier that narrows it.
So, to simplify, what “I” did was make a list of the objections that “I” had to not stop feeding “my” inner minotaurs. Without food, everything dies.
I hope this brief description of some of the principles of the path without resistance will be useful to you.
All the best,
Pi
April 1, 2025
Good day, Pi.
Thank you for the description of your process. So essentially, you made a list of your objections, and saw how without these objections, the selves that made up your ego ‘starved’ to death? Did it take long for the whole process to end? Can you tell me more about how the process went, from writing the list of objections to the objections disappearing? Did you have to ‘see the silliness’ of each objection?
Thank you for taking the time to write about this,
H.
April 1, 2025
Thank you for the description of your process.
— You are welcome.
So essentially, you made a list of your objections, and saw how without these objections, the selves that made up your ego ‘starved’ to death?
— Essentially, yes. It may seem simple, but it took several years of trial and error to reach this conclusion: only after ALL objections were resolved (thanks to reading dozens of books, articles, essays and theses related to brain science and subjective consciousness, among other topics such as paleontology, language and semantics), the process of depriving the ego of fuel was possible. As explained, discovering that the path to the new pure consciousness had no resistance except “myself” was what encouraged “me” to investigate and find one of the best ways to extinguish the ego and the psyche. I do not rule out the possibility of other techniques, and that is why I always encourage each person to seek or create other alternatives for themselves.
The ultimate goal, to live free from the old subjective one-sided consciousness and its consequences (the so-called “human condition”), is both the beginning and the means of any method of actualism.
Did it take long for the whole process to end?
— Once discovered, the path without resistance became my only guide, virtual freedom occurred naturally and in less than three years actual freedom was achieved (in synaptic terms). The more excess baggage accumulated, the more time will be spent clearing that mindspace and expelling the imaginary beings hidden there.
Can you tell me more about how the process went, from writing the list of objections to the objections disappearing?
— “I” found all “MY” own objections, even if some of them were objections shared by other people and avoided the common traps that most actualists and even actually free men and women still fall into (some of which I have already pointed out in DAO).
The next step was to give a rational answer to each of those personal objections. And for that, it was crucial to define three key words: “Exist” (or “Actual”), “Object” and “Concept”. Thanks to the rational definitions of these three words, it was also possible to define consciousness, ego, psyche, body, intelligence, life, thought, mind, instinct, emotion, time, universe, actual freedom, actual world and other treacherous and ambiguous terms.
As a result, it became increasingly easier and faster to give a rational answer to each of the objections on that list.
In the end, the intellectual limits of the rational were surpassed and my method became supra-rational. Contrary to Vineeto’s definition, supra-rational is simply understanding that we will never have a perfectly rational answer to space and the fundamental matter of which atoms are made, much less their origin. This is one of the reasons that “pure intent,” the life force that animates living beings revealed exclusively to native intelligence, continues to confuse the sincerest and intellectually privileged practitioners. Everything is interconnected in this material universe; all you have to do is exert your willpower to stop believing in something that does not exist even though it is happening.
Did you have to ‘see the silliness’ of each objection?
— Yes, but ready-made answers did not help at all. It was vital to find the most sensible answers by “my"” own efforts. In the end, the objections that were barriers served as steppingstones to the next evolutionary level of living full-time and forever pure consciousness.
April 1, 2025
Dear H.
I am fully convinced that you will slowly analyze these basic principles before applying them, adapting them, testing them, refining them and repeating the process until you reach your conclusion. And your destiny.
The freedom of one is the freedom of all!
My only warning, which you may or may not accept, is that you remain anonymous before, during and at the end of this process.
This does not mean that you cannot help others if you have the willingness and resources for such mentoring. In this era of global communication in which English has become the official language, it is perfectly possible to help others from a distance without revealing yourself in the flesh to everyone. This will avoid attacks and aggressions that could compromise your health and safety. Remember: we live with hundreds of people every day, and the vast majority will react negatively to your new condition because they will feel dangerously threatened. And they have their reasons to believe and fear this.
Don’t believe my anastasis theory. Just don’t dismiss it so quickly before investigating whether or not it is possible to be an unsuspecting victim of psychic attacks.
There is still much to discover and unravel no matter what consciousness you are operating in.
I hope I have helped you and I will continue to be at your disposal for any questions along the way.
Sincerely,
Pi
PS: The objections I am referring to are not those of the AFT website nor the tagged objection of the forum DAO, but rather to a single question:
— Why do I continue to resist experiencing this and the next moment that I am living, in this and other places, alone and accompanied, with total joy and without any destructive thoughts and behaviors?
April 2, 2025
Good day, Pi!
Thank you very much for the descriptions of the principles of the PWR. I will carefully analyze them and apply them. As being cautious is part of my nature, I will definitely keep all that you’ve written about anastasis in mind. I want to avoid doing anything that might hurt this body.
April 2, 2025
Good day, H.
No need to thank me, because sharing these seeds and waiting for the fruits and flowers that will silently grow is more than enough for this anonymous nobody who lives in this garden called Earth!
Now a request:
Would you authorize me to post our correspondence on the DAO forum?
Our messages may help others to better understand the path without resistance. Your questions, and answers, were very pertinent and other people will identify with them. And, of course, your anonymity would continue to be preserved.
All the best,
Pi
April 2, 2025
Good day, Pi!
Of course, as long as my anonymity is preserved, I have no problem with you sharing our correspondence on the forum.
All the best,
H.
April 2, 2025
Now the one who thanks you is this other anonymous human being in the crowd!
In return for your kindness, I would like to share with you a response related to the content of your second email:
“… I’ve had PCEs in the past (although I haven’t had one for at least two years now, maybe more) and since then I’ve been reading about actualism and doing my best to apply the method (enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive).
Since I haven’t had any PCEs for so long, I kind of feel I am at a plateau.”
The method proposed by Richard is not “perfect”, and neither is mine.
There’s no “one size fits all” method, and it is up to each person to do their homework. It is an individual task (which affects the collective), solitary (but not isolated from relationships) and creative (done with art) per se.
“Enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive” is the effect.
The basic question to ask is:
“— What is stopping me from enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive?”
Between the sensory stimulus and the cognitive response there is a gap that I have called “mindspace”.
It is precisely in this space that the subjective consciousness of an analogous Self has taken up residence. Not by chance, it is where emotions and feelings were constructed and stored (memorized) as well. The ego is the sum of all of them, and that is why there is the social identity (or hegemonic personality), and the other identities or marginal personalities associated with each emotion and feeling. If this ego and alter-egos were forgotten, even momentarily, due to a memory lapse, the sensory stimulus would be quickly processed, and even more importantly, a new sense would be awakened in the human body, that of proximity. I suspect that proprioception is an electromagnetic sense of spatial orientation, in which each cell acts as a magnet, which perceives the gravitational force drawing the body to the center of the Earth. And the atmospheric pressure on the musculature and bones (in the joints and in the skin/interstitium) crossing the innervated myofascial connective tissue enable an allostatic balance and the body resonates with the environment, creating a type of “proximity sense”.
The experiences of proximity at the dawn of humanity may have been stimulated by the consumption of hallucinogenic foods (1) and the feeling of awe and reverence typical of the animist mentality before the stars and the forces of nature giving rise to language (the art of tracking game by transforming signs into symbols and later creating writing (2)) which in turn became an organ of perception to teach and learn the consciousness of an “I” narrating in an imaginary mental space (the “mindspace”).
“Pure Consciousness Events” (PCE, Forman, 1980) also have their origin in brain chemistry: the body produces dopamine and also dimethyltryptamine (DMT).
Consider that a Pure Consciousness Experience is a universal experience of proximity (or intimacy, if you prefer), like déjà-vu/ jamais vu… and you have countless ways to induce such sensory experience at will!
(1) Wadley and Martin: origins of agriculture
(2) Daniel Quinn, The Story of B (1996).
Here is one technique that “I” applied for inducing a PCE by emptying that mindspace to allow for complete sensory immersion in the path without resistance for hours and often days. This technique “I” practiced upon waking.
Start on an empty stomach and bladder, lying on a mat or bed, arms at your sides. Feel the main points of the body that are pressing on the floor.
Activate the sense of touch aware of the skin merging with the cushion/ mattress.
Close the eyes and touch the roof of the mouth with the tip of the tongue.
Activate proprioception and taste.
Sustain this posture for four complete cycles of slow, deep, and silent breathing through the nose.
Activate smell and hearing.
Keep a rhythm consistent with the lung capacity and allow the body to relax the muscles naturally without collapsing the skeletal structure.
Check the major joints by feeling and increasing the space between them, starting with the legs and arms and then moving up to the vertebrae of the spine and jaw.
As soon as a generalized feeling of lightness envelops the body, as if it were floating over gravity, smile to relax the facial muscles.
Now you can get up.
Wherever you are, look for the window closest to you. Walk over to it, open it and look through it, breathe in and tell yourself mentally what you are touching, seeing, hearing, smelling and tasting…
Done!
The proximity sense experience happens exclusively in our physical interactions with the objective world. It will only end when the first emotion arises, because the “I” will be kidnapping in the memory some remembrance to lean on to lift its ugly head out of the unconscious where it had been put aside.
Peaceful, patient, solitary activities like this one with no immediate purpose disturb the ego that begins to get bored, lacking the chemical influence of some emotion. Despite any sabotage attempts, the next second is another chance and situation to play and win with the willpower of native intelligence and thus contemplate and immerse the body in pure consciousness again and again!
Enjoy!
Pi
PS: Here is a possible explanation for your lack of PCEs in the last 3 years (2022-2025):
https://publicanthropologist.cmi.no/2021/03/18/the-loss-of-proximity-senses/
I renamed this topic and merged another topic into this one.
Could not stay away, eh? A real Proselytizer Without Restraint
1 Like
Hi all,
This may be an apt reminder that ‘PWR’ is not talking about an actual freedom from the human condition as presented on The Actual Freedom Trust when he promulgates his method to reach the “liberation” (link) he says he achieved. Viz:
PWR: Why would I need pure intent now? (link)
RICHARD: Pure intent is a manifest life-force; a genuinely occurring stream of benevolence and benignity that originates in the perfect and vast stillness that is the essential character of the infinitude of the universe. (link)
PWR: Yes, Richard and I are not talking about the same intention. For him, willpower was not necessary… [Emphasis added]. (link)
In fact, Richard is not talking about intention at all when he describes pure intent but about “a genuinely occurring stream of benevolence and benignity” that is existing outside the human condition.
Just because someone uses the words “my new condition as an actually free man” (link) does not mean that he has either the theoretical nor the experiential understanding of the words he is attributing to himself. In his case it means he is trying to muddy the waters and lead people astray for his own ostentatious purpose, made obvious by the fact that he has neither corrected, admitted nor even relabelled his fraudulent claim of living in the same condition as the discoverer of an actual freedom.
Additionally, the very fact that he urges his correspondents to remain quiet and anonymous (link) regarding talking about the genuine actual freedom – the qualities of which many experienced in their own pure consciousness experiences – speaks volumes about his underlying agenda – to stop the genuine peace-on-earth in its tracks. The very belief he presents as justification is just as non-sensical as it is untenable, and shows that he has no clue what an actual freedom is – because becoming actually free is the very ending of the passionate illusion of ‘I and ‘me’ and thus ‘my’ pernicious existence.
Richard: ‘If I may point out? An actual freedom from the human condition entails the extinction of identity (‘I’ as ego and ‘me’ as soul) in toto – which means the entire affective faculty is extinguished as well – and not just ‘a direct perception of this moment’. And I oft-times mention that … that this is what the words ‘actual freedom’ mean (I ought to know what they mean as I coined the phrase).
You are on a hiding to nowhere trying to re-define what my phrase means. (Richard, AF List, No. 12d, 22 Nov 2000)
How then can a physical body, free of the passionate influence of the illusion of both ‘I’ and ‘me’ (controller and psyche) be in any way effected by any feeling beings’ psychic emanations of their illusionary ‘selves’, when it is obvious, for anyone who had a PCE, that no illusionary psyche exists in actuality, neither mine nor yours? I only meet flesh-and-blood bodies.
PWR: … all you have to do is exert your willpower to stop believing in something that does not exist … (link)
Exerting willpower has never helped anyone to stop believing in anything because feelings cannot be stopped by willpower (believing means fervently wishing to be true). Only a mentally confused and/or delusionary impostor can come up with such a convoluted construct of wilful deception, and present it with all the overwrought seriousness of their supposedly “supra-rational” way (link) of feeling/ thinking.
To the (anonymous) correspondent I can only suggest reading what I recommended to @Josef yesterday (link).
Cheers Vineeto
3 Likes
I think there is no such forum member who has this kind of writing style…it almost looks doctored to make it look like a genuine correspondence
I’m more inclined to think that the nickname H for that correspondent means Himself…i.e he is one and the same delusional Proselytizer 
Incase there is indeed a genuine forum member, I urge you to reflect upon things such as infinitude, eternity, stillness and pure intent of the actual universe - which is something that pwr doesn’t mention about in his path and also takes it quite casually when pointed out!
5 Likes
Richard: “…Then at midday on Friday the 30th October 1992 a curious event occurred, due to my intense conviction that it was imperative that someone evince a final and complete condition that would ‘deliver the goods’ so longed for by humanity for millennia.”
“Intense conviction” = willpower
Without willpower, it is virtually impossible to connect with the universal pure intention that reveals itself only to the native intelligence.
I understand how difficult it is to accept that there are other approaches to dealing with the same problem and achieving the same goal. One of the most powerful memes of Mother Culture (the hegemonic culture) preaches that there is only one way to live. Another meme is that the human condition is incorrigible and immutable. And from this distorted view follows the belief that only the traditional method of “X” or “Y” works. Fortunately, this does not happen in science and technology, where methods are continually improved and new methodologies are developed at the cost of much trial and error, and occasional serendipity!
The method proposed by Richard was the first in a series of new methods that will emerge. The path without resistance is just one of these new methods, with three additional advantages: simultaneously eradicating the cluster of egos along with the psyche, preserving health and longevity, and not becoming a fundamentalist movement, all thanks to the maintenance of anonymity. In order to be 180 degrees opposite to the spiritualist and materialist movements, it makes no sense to reveal your name and address in order to present yourself personally as an actually free man or woman (all the Enlightened Ones, Saints, Avatars and Mystics, as well as Intellectuals, Scholars, Philosophers and Politicians have also tried and are still trying to perpetuate a name in History…).
Be your own teacher. But you do not have to start from scratch. Richard already shown the way. And now the path is no longer resistant. There is no time to lose.
People on the Internet don’t have the patience to spend 3 years resolving their own objections, but they do have the patience to put off the task for 10 years or more.
This capacity to miss every second of the opportunity to become actually free and to get caught up in details that only distract them from their objections – and goal – is seemingly limitless…
To respond to “my” objections, “I” created a learning algorithm, and each objection resolved was undoing old synapses and creating new, more complex ones in their place. This process of neuroplasticity facilitated an integration of consciousness whose future consequences could be estimated, but not accurately predicted.
Objections are just that, obstacles. Interestingly, the only obstacle to Richard crossing the final frontier to actual freedom was the altered state of consciousness he had been living in for over a decade.
What if “I” didn’t act? What would be the consequences of this inaction? Postergation, procrastinating was not the problem. Lack of willpower was.
Don’t confuse reason with cause.
The question to ask is not “why”, but how to become actually free now.
If something isn’t working, be bold, be creative and try or create another alternative.
Try to find what works for “you”!
Make peace with the human body.
All the information is already there, all you have to do is untangle it and make it work for you. Be personally involved in making a change for yourself, that’s the only way to evolve. And you’re never “too old”.
Set goals, have a Big Plan.
Sometimes you just have to test it and see what happens. See where you get. You can’t learn without some trauma. Have courage. Don’t hand over the responsibility to someone else - your teacher, your method or anything like that.
And that’s what I’m here for. I’m not here to do it for you, I’m a resource for you to use. In my case, I invested everything I had without fear of the risks. You can do the same. I, and no one else, can do this for you. You have to put yourself under that pressure to find out what you are truly capable of. That is why I am saying, solve YOUR objections until there is no resistance left.
Unlike the traditional method of actualism, there is no lineage in what I do. There are no “students” or “followers”.
I provide information to H (nickname withheld) and others. It is up to them what to do with it. The greatest process of education is trial and error, learning from your own mistakes. You have to jump in the water. The solutions to each of your objections are inside you. They are right there, right under your nose.
Salute!
PWR
1 Like
Hi Persistent Without Reason,
It is not a matter of how “difficult it is to accept”, but rather that you have provided absolutely no reason, rationale, or evidence indicating you are actually free, and provided ample evidence that you aren’t. I asked you twice already to elucidate:
Your answer was that you will only respond if I send you an e-mail as you won’t participate on the forum anymore… after which you participate on the forum anyway, then later post an e-mail correspondence you claim to have had, back onto the forum itself!
In other words your reason for not answering is that you want me to send the same text to you in an e-mail, that you can then answer in an e-mail, that you will then post to the forum anyway – instead of just responding on the forum.
This makes no rational sense whatsoever and is just one of the many pieces of evidence that have accumulated indicating you are on a mission to purposefully waste people’s time and mislead people away from actualism and a genuine actual freedom.
So I repeat my question above for the 3rd time – will it be met with a similarly ridiculous evasion, or something else this time?
Cheers,
Claudiu
3 Likes
Good day, Claudiu.
A forum where it is not safe to disagree is not a forum focused on growth — it is a forum focused on control.
Even though you and/or Vineeto tracked my IP (invasion of privacy) and even though you answered me that you had no intention of having a private correspondence with me, I will help you understand the path without resistance and answer your questions.
But let’s take it one step at a time:
“Your answer was that you will only respond if I send you an e-mail as you won’t participate on the forum anymore… after which you participate on the forum anyway, then later post an e-mail correspondence you claim to have had, back onto the forum itself!”
— Since H (nickname withheld) kindly allowed me to share our messages here, and since you refused to accept my invitation, my posts here may not be of interest to you, but they will be useful to other members.
“In other words your reason for not answering is that you want me to send the same text to you in an e-mail, that you can then answer in an e-mail, that you will then post to the forum anyway – instead of just responding on the forum.”
— As I promised you that our correspondence would be private, I would never post our messages here. Unlike you, I respect other people’s privacy.
“This makes no rational sense whatsoever and is just one of the many pieces of evidence that have accumulated indicating you are on a mission to purposefully waste people’s time and mislead people away from actualism and a genuine actual freedom.”
— I find that the longer I live, the more I worry about people and the less I worry about rules. What you failed to consider is that, just as there are different methodologies, there are different types of people to learn from different methods. In your zealous view, there could be no other method than the one proposed by Richard. And this is one of the most fundamental concepts that drives this culture: the concept of the “One Right Way”. There can not be good ways of doing something, there has to be a right way – one and only way, with all other ways wrong.
Now to your genuine questions:
“…why on earth do you claim to be actually free, as in, experiencing the same actual freedom that Richard did and Vineeto, Peter, Geoffrey, Srinath, etc. do?”
— Simple: without a legion of egos and without a Superego, the actual world has no resistance to being directly perceived by the senses and intellectually appreciated by the native intelligence. Every actually free man and woman has his or her idiosyncrasies, while simultaneously living in the same actual world where matter and motion are eternal.
But unlike many actually free man and woman, on the path without resistance there is no confusion between infinity and eternity. If something is eternal, it has no beginning or end. Eternity (forever) refers to the time metric of motion. It is not correct to use the word infinity when referring to the size of things (existing objects). This is irrational. “Eternal” can be applied only in the context of time (motion plus memory). When referring to the concept of matter and space, that is, the eternal universe, it is a context of dynamic concept – motion. There is no infinite matter and much less immobility/stillness in the universe: an infinite object is impossible and all matter is in movement, assembling and disassembling… forever! This happens because there is constant movement from the atom to the galaxies. All objects are continually pulling on and colliding with other objects.
In the actual world everything is on fire! (I see colors as more vivid).
And here no one can pull my strings. I don’t have any. There is no more an organized subject to be the enjoyer or sufferer, no owner of the experiences.
“On what basis have you ascertained yourself to be experiencing the same thing?”
— If all my words so far have not revealed this to you, I suggest you read them again from another perspective: that of an actually free man. All experiences of proximity (or intimacy, if you prefer) have something in common: the absence of the Self. Try it.
“If you are just straightforward and describe yourself as having reached some other end-goal that you think is more valuable than actual freedom, you can just go ahead and say that, and everyone will be far better informed and there will be no misleading. Instead you mingle words and mash concepts and attempt to mislead your fellow human beings. Why do this?”
— Actual freedom is the end-goal, I just discovered a different path and, for sure, there will be others even more direct and without the need for so many adjectives to describe a natural state that is a human right and not a patented brand.
To conclude, it was quite clear that your biggest objection seems to be the lack of proof, of evidence regarding the actual free condition of this author who writes to you:
“It is not a matter of how “difficult it is to accept”, but rather that you have provided absolutely no reason, rationale, or evidence indicating that you are actually free, and provided ample evidence that you aren’t.”
Read carefully:
Evidence is a part of religion. What part of explaining and understanding requires evidence?
“Evidence” can only be used to convince and recruit. Only religious people ask for evidence.
Religion is not about God or about the existence of God, and it is not about spirituality or holy books. Religion has to do with some of the key words contained in the instant question: experiment, validate, right, correct. Religion is about persuading, convincing, converting, and recruiting…
Religion: belief, opinion.
Pure consciousness experiences are 100% description full of adjectives. PCE has no power or authority to explain anything. Description and persuasion, remember?
And what is the purpose of an experience if not to change (or confirm) the mind of the experiencer and of the crowd?
Therefore, if someone is expecting proof and evidence of the path without resistance through experiment to confirm his/her preconceived and “correct”, “factual” belief or to change it, s/he is in the “wrong” method. There are churches and monasteries and temples for that sort of thing. In the path without resistance, I explain how to be actually free objectively, not for people to buy the snake oil, but so that people understand the proposed techniques. They can reach their own conclusions after that.
Asking for proof is proof that we are living in that movie Idiocracy where everyone is getting dumber…
What part are you having trouble understanding about the path without resistance? Kindergarteners understand what a path without resistance is. It should be straight forward.
However, it is curious that no one here is asking for proofs from the method proposed by Richard. However you raise the issue only when it comes to the path without resistance.
It seems like you read, but you do so very superficially. You end up not understanding. I’ll try again…
- There’s been a paradigm shift and you have not caught up.
- The path without resistance is about explaining, not about believing (i.e., religion). You are doing religion: opinion, evidence, proof, experiment, prediction, usefulness.
- In order to EXPLAIN how to be actually free, you MUST make an assumption (i.e., hypothesis) about an INVISIBLE, INTANGIBLE entity (e.g., I, self, ego, psyche, etc.) which you have no chance whatsoever of detecting through an experiment. There can NEVER be evidence of an INVISIBLE, INTANGIBLE entity, and proof is a personal opinion (i.e., religion).
There are traditionalists — those who believe in the ancient religions like, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, Islamism… and the gods and fables that come with them.
And there are irrationalists or ideots — those who laugh at the ones who believe in gods and then begin to follow cherry-picking dogmas around and to talk about “pure intention” without ever having understood the concept after decades.
“Time is on my side”, like in that song. But you shouldn’t waste YOUR time searching for evidence when the path without resistance (and Richard’s proposed method) is at your disposal.
As for the process that led me to the path without resistance, I can say that it was the same one with which technologies are developed: through trial and error…
“I have not failed. I merely found 10,000 ways that don’t work.”
— Thomas Edison
All the best,
PWR
PS: I will soon post a short text about dopamine that may interest you.
Before this grows legs of its own, please clarify what ”tracking an IP” means to you.
I’m saying this to clarify that, in the way the internet currently works, (almost) every site you visit will not only register your IP but also identify its geographical range and your operator. There are other methods of identifying internet users that some of the more draconian sites will employ. Depending on how your VPN is set up, it might leak your actual IP—and apart from a few exceptions, most mainstream VPN services will likely have little regard for your personal data if push comes to shove.
By using the internet, you’re always exposing your IP in one way or another, and reverse lookups are to be expected. Especially since you’re already using a VPN and should be acquainted with the intricacies.
And lest I get tarred with my own brush, I also use both Proton and private relay.
1 Like