Greetings to all (The Path Without Resistance)

I would like to introduce myself before explaining how I got here and how I am living at the moment. In any case, for professional reasons, I will preserve my anonymity.

I am a married man with no children, 51 years old. I was born and live in a certain Western nation with a Catholic majority and Iberian colonization. I don’t have a college degree, and I taught myself English so I could travel and study abroad.

In early 2007, I contacted one of U. G. Krishnamurti’s friends by email to let him know that I intended to translate and publish “The Mystique of Enlightenment” in my country. While researching this anti guru on the internet, I found a mention of him in a link that took me to the website www.actualfreedom.com.au in March 2007, the very month in which U. G. passed away. Upon discovering the real cause of U. G.'s death, and read a few pages about him on that site, I decided to cancel my editorial project and delve deeper into the words of Richard, Peter and Vineeto. In the very first articles, I recalled the “pure consciousness experiences” that filled my childhood and adolescence. And for three years I continued to read each page in detail, following the correspondence and messages, including those from groups and blogs whose members discussed and debated actualism.

Peter inaugurated the “direct route” on December 30, 2009, and the actualism method has continued to work for other pioneers. My only objection was that the brain models of neuroscientists Paul MacLean and Joseph Ledoux reused on the site www.actualfreedom.com.au were scientifically outdated. And my current intellect was incapable of accepting a “triune brain” or a “fear circuit” in the amygdala. For this reason alone, in 2011 I started planning a new method from scratch (at the time, I chose not to inform the AFT directors). After consulting different authors from different areas of human knowledge and hundreds of scientific articles, I identified what I called “the missing links of consciousness” in the works of Daniel Quinn, Julian Jaynes, Jack Trimpey, Jeremy Griffith, Iain McGilchrist, Richard E. Cytowic and Lisa Feldman Barrett.

At the end of this long research and the consequent formulation of a new method of eradicating the old, obsolete and destructive hegemonic mentality, I went through all five stages of grief (denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance). Finally, on the night of June 9, 2024, unaware of Richard’s recent death, I went through the sixth and last of them, liberation. The method that freed the native intelligence to operate without a “censor” in the world where “matter is not merely passive” and psychic emanations do not affect it, involved a new type of union of the senses - a neurological phenomenon with causes still unknown and with a close relationship with the arts and literature - and excluded the irrational definitions of several widely accepted (although rarely questioned) theories, concepts and words.

This suprarational methodology that I created and tested proved to be effective in the face of this body’s genetic inheritance and the predatory cultural vision in which its mind grew up and was conditioned. It was a particular method, personalized by and for the peculiarities of that self-destructive individual and the violent environment in which he lived. Happily, I no longer need to apply it, because the risk of an anastasis has been nullified, and now I can share here some discoveries and sources of reference as well as compare notes with others who may be on the “plateau”, that threshold between the divided mind and pure consciousness, or between virtual and actual freedom.

Moving—and contemplating—trusting the path without resistance so evident in the universe, was both the beginning, the middle, and the end for “me.”

4 Likes

Welcome PWR.

Your post has a measured quality which I enjoyed reading. I would love to read more about how your amended scientific model helped you become actually free.

Have you published a website? Or have some resources that I could read?

Cheers

Andrew

2 Likes

A new forum member with years-long familiarity with actualism, posting anonymously and from a cloud-service-provider IP address, does raise the alarm bells somewhat.

I’ve sent this post, along with some posts from @lexej, as well as the first part of Richard’s He was using a HUGE Assortment of Epithets’: Confutation to an AI for analysis, and here was its response. Some food for thought!

3 Likes

Hi Claudiu,

Well done :smile:

Cheers Vineeto

2 Likes

We all have the right to our privacy and the reason why some of us hide our emails and IPs is because otherwise admins can reveal our identity if they feel like it… What I mean is that, personally, I don’t find it suspicious that someone today chooses to be anonymous and uses various methods to enhance their privacy. The “several compelling indicators” that the AI mentioned in its conclusion aren’t that compelling in my opinion.

Today they are considered outdated, but I’m curious – how exactly has this prevented you from moving forward or applying the method? Could you explain, please?

Can you share more, and if it’s not too much to ask, how does it differ from the method of actualism?

EDIT: Ah and by the way, welcome PWR!

2 Likes

If it is Chaz, you gotta respect the hustle, lol.

Being a troll for decades is pretty impressive. Troll hall of fame material.

Respect :fist:

2 Likes

Hi Roy,

Of course – however what prompted suspicion is the constellation of:

  • An ostensibly new participant that nevertheless has been around for 17 years, but has never participated on any actualist forum in the meantime
  • Who has an intimate familiarity with actualism
  • Is posting anonymously
  • Has a dramatic story
  • and of course, somehow there is always some fault or flaw to be found with Richard or Richard’s writings in particular

It is very much the modus operandi of this “Chaz” person, who really has been trolling the various actualist forums for decades!

The using a VPN or proxy to hide their IP was just a cherry on top of it all.

The AI then readily provided a compelling analysis considering all the above, with minimal effort from my part.

I think it is truly hard to consider and accept that someone would do all that “Chaz” has done. In other words, it’s a matter of being unfamiliar with them – and as such the reaction here appears unwarranted. My suggestion would be for you to read Richard’s “He was using a HUGE Assortment of Epithets’: Confutation”, at least the beginning part up until “Accordingly, and primarily for the benefit of those who came along later, this fully-referenced duly-annotated quote-by-quote confutation is finally being made public.” before continuing your correspondence with “PWR” – and if some of the misquotes presented there are compelling to you then definitely read Richard’s confutation of those as well.

Cheers,
Claudiu

2 Likes

Care to describe the method?

Thank you for your kind courtesy, Andrew.

Have you published a website?

No. In any case, I don’t plan to.

Or have some resources that I could read?

About which topic?

Thank you too, Roy.

Today they are considered outdated, but I’m curious – how exactly has this prevented you from moving forward or applying the method? Could you explain, please?

It’s been over two decades since MacLean and Ledoux’s brain models were refuted and criticized. But as for your questions, these erroneous explanations about the activities and parts of the brain and its emotions and instincts served to show me a glimpse of a path without resistance. The method proposed by Richard is the one of least resistance. However, while the path without resistance was customized by and for a single individual, the method of actualism proposes that it can be applied by everyone.

Everyone has different levels of intelligence, experience, personality, hormones, reactions to stress, etc…

Justine applied a different method to himself but failed in the end because he ignored anastasis, a law of Nature. Today he has become a neo-nihilist…

Fortunately, that shrewd old intellect did not make the same mistakes.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day…

Sorry, but I couldn’t resist when I found this image of a real sock puppet

Hi Mr. Claudiu,

AI is not better than NI (Native Intelligence) in this subject…

Let’s go check:

An ostensibly new participant who nevertheless has been around for 17 years, but has never participated on any actualist forum in the meantime

Assumption. I may have been a member in several forums, without ever posting any messages…

Who has an intimate familiarity with actualism

Obvious. Fruit of 3 intensive years of reading.

Is posting anonymously

Amazing! I prefer privacy, but privacy is often a false image in today’s modern lifestyle…

Has a dramatic story

Sometimes life is stranger than fiction… but the drama is over.

and of course, somehow there is always some fault or flaw to be found with Richard or Richard’s writings in particular

You almost got it right. The long-outdated neuroscientific explanations of MacLean and Ledoux were used by Peter first. If Richard had delved a little deeper into this topic (work that I dared to do on my own), he would probably have updated Ledoux’s studies and perhaps even included Lisa Feldman Barret’s more recent research on emotions.

Straight to the point, Mr. EDZD:

Again…
That method was customized by and for a single person in the entire world (and that person was a ghost), for a specific culture and place on the planet (which is always spinning and never standing still), and for a time that has already passed.

If something isn’t working for you, try creating something new too, instead of continuing to make the same mistakes and expecting different results. That’s what that old ghost did.

I’m sensing a lot of resistance here… :blush:

1 Like

The marvels of modern AI. I can’t not share the following with my fellow forum members:

1 Like

Interesting how AI tends to agree with the previous instructions that humans feed them. But as they say, garbage in, garbage out…

One side benefit is just how much labor this saves :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Chaz, or whatever your name is,

Wouldn’t it be so much more fun if you indeed has become actually free?

I mean, trolling has it’s pay offs, for sure, but can you imagine trying to convince anyone you actually did it? ; ‘self’ immolation for the benefit of your body and every body.

That would be the troll of all time.

Reminds me of a whole genre of modern jokes, e.g. where the biggot becomes gay just to break a gay guy’s heart.

Jeez, it must really suck to be ‘you’. The time and effort made over decades to attack actualism being the best ‘you’ can do.

There’s no condemnation implied in that “Jeez”; just casual observation. Life does indeed suck as a ‘self’.

Thanks @claudiu

I am also glad to hear AI is making your moderator job easier!

Chaz, the funniest bit is if ‘you’ did do it, the joke would be on ‘you’, but ‘you’ would be completely fine with that and find it hilarious!

I like that imagination. ‘chaz’ finding the ‘safe path’ is actually not safe at all, and laughing with inexpressible hilarity as ‘chaz’ disappears as if ‘chaz’ never was at all. Laughing at the end is a worthy life goal, hijacked unfairly by Hollywood villains. :rofl:

Good afternoon, everyone, it’s a rainy morning here where I am and it must be an equally rainy morning or evening somewhere on this big planet.

The robotic AI, as well as the other organic AI that is using it, are both wrong (unconscious bias?). This actual body is not the organic AI that you claim so confidently.

As I have made it very clear that I am using a pseudonym, it doesn’t matter what the AIs say to verify me. This would go on indefinitely - for those who don’t understand this.

By the way, most of the members of this group are unwitting sock puppets.

The welcome here reminded me of the childhood times when school bullying was reserved for that naive kid dazzled by the school universe…

It is particularly interesting to note that precisely those who are on the “plateau” prefer to trust a machine than investigate whether what I wrote makes sense or not. The conclusion is individual or should be.

All I can do is answer questions pertinent to the process of eradicating the various “selves” (more than 7 billion people are unconscious victims of multiple personalities) and how to cross without resistance this frontier between virtual freedom (easily achieved by the majority) and actual freedom (which is the final destination that some have reached, but that no one has managed to annul the anastasis).

The fact that you did not see something does not mean that it did not happen.

Either the actualism method works for everyone or it does not. From what I have observed, it has worked for some; if you find that the method is not effective for you, then you should consider innovating, but I have no doubt that others can use Richard’s method successfully.

The website www.actualfreedom.com.au is visited daily by hundreds of sincere people, so some of them will also succeed. It is inevitable and that is wonderful! The others, who have been stuck on the same “plateau” for years, can be helped in other ways.

It turns out that I am a liberated man living in the path without resistance, not because what others think of me matters to me, but because the only way to live and die is with freedom.

Let’s see, I only told you part of my story, which I thought you would be able to handle, because I didn’t want to tell you about the unbelievable parts of my life, which would scare you, honestly.

I value life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness.

I can only show you the path without resistance that you already live on but don’t know. Whether you choose to follow it or not is up to each one of you. Or it should be.

.

Now, the rain has stopped. Time to put away my peace pipe.