Greetings to all (The Path Without Resistance)

[claudiu]

@PWR

[Vineeto]: You cannot be referring to pure intent, which only becomes an irresistible pull when you tap into it with naiveté and sincerity.
— “Pure” intent… what is the reason for such a superfluous adjective? If the intent is not pure, then it is not intent. And no intent arises when there is not enough willpower to sustain it. Intention and willpower, two sides of the same coin. This is an important topic that I have already discussed and only one member paid due attention to (maybe because most are already indoctrinated by outdated concepts?).
Starting my own manumission project was an act of sincerity and naiveté towards this body. My old “self” acted instead of just “feeling”. Fortunately!

Thank you for confirming again that you know not what the term ”pure intent” refers to in actualism lingo (despite having extensively been reading the AFT site and actualism discussion groups for over a decade), neither intellectually (as in what it is literally defined to mean in plain language) nor experientially.

There is not a clearer marker I can think of that you are not actually free from the human condition.

@PWR

If admitting a simple mistake due to lack of knowledge or attention is already difficult, imagine how difficult it will be to admit that there are other methods besides the one proposed by Richard… Or, even more difficult, that other people can reach the same destination without depending on third-party methods.

As you yourself aren’t actually free, there’s no evidence that there is another way to reach that same destination, than those that have already been shown to work and replicated.

It makes it easy, now people will know if they follow what you say that it won’t lead to actual freedom. Thank you again for making it simple!

Cheers,
Claudiu