Hello Frau “V”,
Fact-checkers have already fallen by the wayside, since the fiascos and abuses they caused on social media since 2020 and for which they were punished and forced to reconsider the “facts” that only those Big Techs approved. In other words, censorship is what censorship does.
As for a frank, honest and open conversation, just read the first responses to my first post here. While some members were polite and courteous, only one more bully zealot chose to accuse me of being a “sock puppet”…
And I’m also not here to jump through hoops at anyone’s command.
Since there’s no point in politely asking to accept my anonymity and not track my IP (shame on you, Claudus) in the face of the threat of revealing my private address and compromising my security, I’ll limit myself to responding to members who are genuinely frank, honest and willing to communicate openly.
Invasion of privacy is a ________.
Following:
I am an expert in my own method, just as a professional mechanic knows more about car repairs than an amateur.
Whatever this “Peace on earth” is, which “began by acting on myself”, it has nothing at all to do with actuality/ factuality.
— If you don’t start by acting on yourself, where do you start then?
You cannot be referring to pure intent, which only becomes an irresistible pull when you tap into it with naiveté and sincerity.
— “Pure” intent… what is the reason for such a superfluous adjective? If the intent is not pure, then it is not intent. And no intent arises when there is not enough willpower to sustain it. Intention and willpower, two sides of the same coin. This is an important topic that I have already discussed and only one member paid due attention to (maybe because most are already indoctrinated by outdated concepts?).
Starting my own manumission project was an act of sincerity and naiveté towards this body. My old “self” acted instead of just “feeling”. Fortunately!
You confirmed in your last post that your “Peace on earth” is not the same as pure intent because it can be discarded like a redundant tool –
— Intention sustained by an unbreakable willpower has been used since 2011 for a single purpose that has already been achieved more than 9 months ago (enough time to gestate a child). Why continue to focus intention on doing something that has already been done successfully? Once a method has fully fulfilled its function, it should be discarded. I never carry excess baggage. And if a self-declared immaculate consciousness still depends on pure intent to be maintained, then that consciousness is still quite fragile and volatile…
What you are basically saying is that one should use the “Method without Resistance” (PWR™) in order to eliminate “all traces of resistances” and this concomitantly eliminates pure intent as well, as it is “no longer necessary”.
— More and more a lack of intellectual integrity in this straw man fallacy, insisting on personal interpretations instead of definitions of the key words presented. Eliminating all traces of resistance does not “concomitantly” eliminate intent because intent is not resistance. Think a little before your next move.
This is more than a circular argument – this is a tangled web of phantasmagorical proportions.
— Since you are attacking the phantasm of a straw man, there is nothing to respond to here.
The U.G. Krishnamurti was born into a Hindu Brahmin family, I suppose the Hindu term seems more appropriate.
— You “suppose”…?
If admitting a simple mistake due to lack of knowledge or attention is already difficult, imagine how difficult it will be to admit that there are other methods besides the one proposed by Richard… Or, even more difficult, that other people can reach the same destination without depending on third-party methods.
Richard discovered a method for himself from the experiences of pure consciousness he had. I discovered a method for myself from the systematic resolution of MY own particular objections. Both are methods customized by and for their own authors. Which does not prevent them from being applied, improved or adapted by others with the same objective.
Procrastination is postponing what we know needs to be done. When I understood this, the doors that were never closed revealed themselves, and they had no portal at all! The path to actual freedom is always open and present! Without resistor, without resistance.
What you have failed to comprehend/comment on, however, is that U.G. Krishnamurti still had a ‘Self’ and therefore his psyche was intact. Hence your self-modulated term of anastasis with its contrived life-threatening influence has, according to your own definition, no application for U.G. Krishnamurti or any enlightened person
— Anastasis is an organic phenomenon of psychic origin (there is no “soul” without a living body) that virtually affects the physical and electromagnetic human body of any person, whether they are a captive of modern normosis or a victim of some altered state of consciousness, as well as people who are actually free and who ignore it (not anymore, because the warning has been given and the most prudent will slow down on the curve ahead…). This is my hypothesis and theory. The cases I used as examples are not proof, but serve as statistics for each person to analyze, test and draw their own conclusions.
Here is a typical symptom of anastasis, ignorance or alienation with one’s own precarious state of health, as you yourself wrote:
“It was actually amazing how long he [Richard] held out with all of this going on, partly unbeknownst to him or me until he got to hospital.”
Facts that have already occurred cannot be changed. We will make the same mistakes only when we are unaware of where we went wrong or when we refuse to accept that we did.
Now it is a matter of testing my hypothesis and theory. The conclusion and consequences thereof will be the responsibility of each one.
Remember: happiness is still an emotion, while joy is a constant natural state of the human body free from an imaginary happy/unhappy being. And being harmless means protecting one’s own body and the other bodies around you (and this is not a nurture instinct or altruism, but pure common sense: who would want to get on a plane whose pilot is on the verge of a breakdown?).
For all this, it is understandable and expected that I am receiving more emails from members who understood my words and who do not want to be intimidated by the “fact-checking moderators”.
Vineeto, we are not superior, we just stopped making the same same old mistakes. However, we can still – and probably will – make new mistakes (no one is infallible) and that is why I am discreet in not teaching my particular method, but only the basic principles behind it.
If all this helps you understand my words and change your bias so that we can have a more productive conversation, I remain at your disposal.
If you continue to insist on not calling me by the acronym I chose as my nickname, you will be wasting an opportunity for us to learn together and from each other.
Talking to others who are actually free, incapable of issuing any psychic attacks (premeditated or involuntary), is not a problem for me.
Best regards,
PWR
PS: If someone introduces themselves to me as actually free man or woman, I will congratulate them and celebrate with them, because it is a game in which we all win. If the person in question is mistaken or trying to deceive me, this is not a problem for me, but for them. It is that simple. I have no need to attack anyone or ask them for proofs. Actions speak louder than words where I am.