Connection with Pure Intent == Rememoration

Actualism
1

Per Miguel’s paraphrasing, Geoffrey (@geoffrey) defines [the connection to] Pure Intent as the very “revival” (rememoration) of one’s PCE in this moment right now.

Also:

For completion, here’s how Richard defines ‘rememoration’:

RICHARD: […] by dint of a viscerally-felt instinctually-intuitive rememoration (‘re-’ + ‘memoration’) of memorable experiencing already memorialised in the memorative facility – revivified feelingly therein and thereby infused presentially[1] with luminous vibrancy when brought thus anew into consciousness – any such indelibly-impressed experience comes freshly into present conscious existence by that rememorative function itself.

Thus, in conjunction with those ‘making present’ words, I now have the linguistic means to vividly communicate how feeling-being ‘Richard’ not only accessed ancestral memories and apotheosised wisdom/ gnostic knowledge of yore – all memorialised affectively/ psychically, in the human psyche itself, in what is metaphysically/ metempirically referred to as an ‘aetheric library’ or ‘akashic record’ – but also how ‘he’ utilised that rememorative-presentiation process to imbue/ suffuse ‘his’ day-to-day life with the ambience/ the flavour/ the appeal of the PCE and thus invigorate and vitalise ‘his’ moment-to-moment experiencing as well.

[…] the ascription of the instinctual-subliminal-visceral-intuitive characteristics to those special-purpose memorative & rememorative type words was the main reason for resurrecting them.

Mailing List 'D' Claudiu / Beoman Claudiu Dragon Emu Fire Golem

  1. Viz:

    • presentially (ad.): in a way which supposes actual presence.
    [emphasis added]. ~ (p. 516; James Knowles 1851 Dictionary).
    • presentiated (pp.): made present. ~ (p. 516; James Knowles 1851 Dictionary).
    • presentiate (v.t.): make or render present in place or time; to cause to be perceived or realised as present. [now rare. 1659. perh. fr. present + ate‹3›, after different, differentiate]. ~ (Oxford English Dictionary).
    • presentiate (vt.): to make present. ~ (p. 516; James Knowles 1851 Dictionary).
    • presential (a.): supposing actual presence. ~ (p. 516; James Knowles 1851 Dictionary).
    • presentiality (n.): state of being present. ~ (p. 516; James Knowles 1851 Dictionary).
    • presentiating (ppr.): making present. ~ (p. 516; James Knowles 1851 Dictionary).

    ↩︎
3 Likes
2

Humm I would rather put it that rememoration of the PCE brings about pure intent, rather than pure intent being the rememorative action per se

Notably, one still experiences pure intent in a PCE (albeit much more directly), and of course while one is in a PCE one is not rememorating a PCE, one is living a PCE – so it’s not the rememorative action that is what pure intent is, rather, the purpose of the rememorative action is to bring about that pure intent which is ultimately derived from the purity of the PCE

One could say to be successfully rememorating the PCE is to be experiencing pure intent, which might be a clearer way to put it, it’s just key to recognize that pure intent exists and can be experienced, without any rememoration per se (i.e., in a PCE, or of course, when actually free)

Cheers
Claudiu

2 Likes
3

Okay, edited the post for precision.

4

Ahh but pure intent itself is “an intimate connection betwixt the near-purity of the sincerity of naiveté and the pristine-purity of that actual innocence which is inherent to living life as a flesh-and-blood body only” [link]!

Hence you are describing what “the connection to an intimate connection” is, which is not quite right is it?

It’s a bit tricky, the key is that pure intent is both that “pristine-purity” itself[1], and the ‘connection’ between one’s naiveté and that purity.

The reason is that there is no difference between that purity which one is when fully free, and the purity which a feeling-being can experience and pulls one towards that destiny – it is, in essence, the very same thing.

To help make sense of it, I recommend reading Richard’s entire July 6 2015 post to Martin, complete with the full extensive context included therein: [link].

What is critical to understand is that pure intent has nothing to do with ‘me’, it is entirely outside of ‘me’ – hence no action that ‘I’ can take, be it a revival or a rememoration or anything else, can be what pure intent is. The closest accurate point to what you wrote (the minimal edit distance) would be to say that the action of rememoration is what allowing pure intent is – which I would probably agree with, I would have to think a bit more about whether there are ‘other’ ways to allow pure intent, or if they all essentially amount to that (rememoration).

The purity of the PCE provides an irresistable draw to those who allow it – yet together with that draw can come a deep dread as one instinctively understands that it will be the end of me (even if this be not a conscious thought), hence there are possibly a lot of forces (subconscious or otherwise) at play in one’s psyche to pull one away from understanding all this, even if one be feeling one is earnestly pursuing a pragmatic and straightforward approach to it all.

To be taking ‘me’ or any action ‘I’ take to be pure intent, is such an action, as this places the entire liberative impetus and freeing mechanism firmly on the side of the human condition, where it will never work.

The key is to tilt it the other way, to experience pure intent as it is, strictly on the ‘other’ side of ‘me’, ie outside the human condition, on the side of actuality. Then one is well on the path.

This can be immensely unsatisfying as it is not possible to appropriately conceptualize it. How can ‘I’ take some action to experience that which is outside of ‘me’? How can ‘I’ experience anything outside of ‘me’ at all? How can ‘I’ be connected to that which has naught to do with ‘me’? I don’t exactly know “how it works”… and Geoffrey indicated to me that he never really had a satisfying answer, until he was already outside of the human condition (he is satisfied now :smile:).

The key is that it’s experiential, so the way to do it is to experience it, which means having a PCE and rolling out that golden clew as one winds one’s way back to where one normally is. It doesn’t mean to shut off one’s thinking in a spiritual repression way, just rather to redirect one’s efforts thataway, then, with the experience actively occurring, it will be possible to describe it, at least in a way that will make sense to someone else already experiencing it :sweat_smile:.

Cheers,
Claudiu

  1. RICHARD: Pure intent is a manifest life-force; a genuinely occurring stream of benevolence and benignity that originates in the perfect and vast stillness that is the essential character of the infinitude of the universe." [link] ↩︎

3 Likes
5

Jeez :grimacing: I’ll get back at this in a bit.

FWIW, during the day when the last PCE happened (Syd's PCE Log - #12 by syd), I had been rememorating like all get out (as I was going about my day including swimming) - which was ‘mostly’ working, but I easily pulled back into familiar fears, the investigation of which lead to the PCE in the evening back home.

1 Like