This is about the only thing you wrote here that I can even relate to. I wrote a similar thing at the end of post #15 (albeit based on my PCEs) and I wonder if, in your desire to make dismissive comments about Musk et. al., you have overlooked it? The key word is "transpires naturally".
From what I recall, they were (and are) all about ‘techniques’ a.k.a. ‘technics’ or ‘techs’ (as distinct from enjoying & appreciating being here right now). And techniques can often be idiosyncratic. Is your ‘caring’ (with that overweight person for instance) under the same bucket?
As far as I understand, the only effort required is to get the momentum going:
RESPONDENT: Richard, would you say that it takes quite a bit of effort and determination to follow through in asking the question to it’s conclusion?
RICHARD: I do say it takes some doing to start off with yet, with application and diligence and patience and perseverance, one soon gets the knack of it and more and more time is spent enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive – the sheer delight of being as happy and harmless as is humanly possible whilst remaining a ‘self’ – and, as the slightest diminishment of such felicity and innocuity is a warning signal (a flashing red light as it were) that one has inadvertently wandered off the way, it is remarkably simple in practice … and thus easy.
Furthermore, it is fun to find out what makes one ‘tick’. Commonly Raised Objections The Actualism Method Is Too Difficult
Aside from that, if it not be effortless, then there’s something to look at: