This one is such a wonderful thing to contemplate, I will say that you are making a mistake here though.
The vast and utter stillness of infinitude is not static/inert! The problem is that ‘I’ as ‘self’ project a boundary onto the universe, ‘I’ take it as if it’s a closed system (like a very big container), so then yes if this system is said to be fundamentally still then it therefore must be static/inert at core. Hence the need for a big bang to “get it all going” and of course a very sad “return to nothingness” one day 
Infinitude (having no edges) is not a closed system, there are no boundaries to the universe. This accounts for the most astonishing state of affairs… The universe is dynamic/active/“alive” and yet it’s essential character is a vast and utter stillness - wow!
This is why - “Pure intent is a palpable life-force; an actually occurring stream of benevolence and benignity that originates in the vast and utter stillness that is the essential character of the universe itself.”
The stillness of infinitude is not inert, it is “the life giving foundation of all that is apparent”.