The universe has no intent, but it possesses the capacity — the necessary properties or conditions — for those things to occur. We are in agreement. I may be missing your point though…
I think it’s because you probably spend more time than me reading the website that you would use those words to describe the experience. If you stick to a dictionary, the words “pure intent” make little sense, in my opinion, to describe it.
I think I got my point across because @Shashank understood it. I’m simply commenting on that specific description of “pure intent”! You write like the wise one showing the student the way, but I’m simply trying to describe what I experience and confirm it with others because it’s not always easy to put experience into words.
Can I suggest something? And please don’t take this the wrong way: If you ignore everything you’ve read on the site, after you have a “pure consciousness experience”, try to describe it in your own words. Would you use the same words that are on the site? Is there a chance that you’re being influenced by what you’ve intellectually learned?
I’m not saying that Richard is wrong or that the site is wrong, only that the way each person describes their experience depends on many factors. I think it would be very strange if we all described the experience in the same way. It could be an indication that the knowledge may be acting as a form of conditioning — an interpretation of the experience.