Good day, Frau Vineeto.
Now that Chaz aka PWR has returned after his most recent swan-song (link), suggesting people should email him privately so as to avoid the scrutiny of “biased moderators or Guardians to dogmatize or censor you” (link) I will add a few more comments for a clarification, particularly for those who are seduced by the words of “no resistance”.
While most members have nicknames, only mine was quickly labeled “sock puppet”…
And my explanations about the various reasons for keeping my real name private continue to be ignored…
I have returned to answering some members’ questions out of consideration for them, even though they also ignored my request to send a private message directly to my email…
I “believe” (and hope I am not mistaken) that everyone here, except those who have already fulfilled their destiny, is interested in finding out more about another path to reach the same destination. It is possible to get to Australia by boat, but a plane flight will be much faster and more comfortable. Fortunately, there is not just one plane that goes to that destination!
Now, I will take the opportunity to write about “beliefs” and “facts”.
Trading beliefs for supposed facts is equivalent to transforming facts into absolute truths.
Even if this is an absolute fact, if we cannot verify our existence/perception/reality as “absolute”, then we still cannot confirm any given “fact” as absolute.
What appears as a fact to us, may only be that based on our perception, of our knowledge, both of which may not be, and likely are not, absolute.
Until we can rule out all possibilities which leave possibilities such as this open, then we cannot conclude anything as an “absolute fact”.
Absolut fact = Truth
And truth is religion…
Few people on the planet understand that what is fact for them is not necessarily fact for others because all facts are like truths, they are OPINIONS.
In the end, all you have left are opinions. And personal opinions are personal beliefs.
As soon as I read Richard’s words in 2007, I understood that it was also necessary to believe in at least 0,000001% of what he was presenting, otherwise neither I nor anyone else would have any desire to delve into the topic of actual freedom.
And objections only arise after one begins to study and test a METHOD (1).
(1) Method, as a term, is derived from the Greek méthodos (from meta: after and ho’dos: path) along a path. Hence, a method describes the steps along a path, how to go about it, an approach, or as defined in the English language: ‘A way or manner of doing something’ (The Advanced Learners Dictionary 1958, p. 792).
From: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232991016_There_are_no_qualitative_methods_-_nor_quantitative_for_that_matter_The_misleading_rhetoric_of_the_qualitative-quantitative_argument
Objections are part of the process. Therefore, in my opinion, it is smarter to accept them rather than avoid them.
“Nerve cells that fire together wire together” is one of the most basic principles of neuroscience that states that when neurons fire repeatedly in the same way, they become wired together. This is also known as Hebb’s Law (2).
(2) Hebbian theory - Wikipedia
To get around this, I started thinking like a Martian anthropologist (yes, I know Martians don’t exist, but I hope you’ll accept this metaphor).
To change beliefs and thought processes, WHAT I would learn would not be as important as HOW I think. That’s why the suprarational method I applied removes the observer.
Anyone is capable of thinking rationally, critically examining and completely understanding what another person presents to them.
The good news is that everyone CAN reprogram their brains and, therefore, their thinking. We can all improve our thinking, even while it is still held hostage by that mini ego legion (you are your emotions, and emotions are many and not just one. Here is another tip for the most attentive to investigate).
I used my intention to change the way my mind worked.
Neuroplasticity is a “fact”.
We have about 86 billion neurons firing. This is our mind, or brain in action.
Learning is making new neural connections. And it is memory that will maintain them.
For all these reasons, since my first post here, I have encouraged everyone to explore these neuroscientific topics by seeking more up-to-date sources (and I have even indicated some authors to start with). Ad hoc knowledge will not always be enough if it is based on obsolete information.
As for anastasis, just remember the psychic barrier projected by Devika/Irene over Richard, which only lost its power after her death.
I understand that this danger had gone unnoticed even by Richard. Fortunately, through serendipity, I discovered a way to nullify such an extrasensory phenomenon.
Using a certain person’s method, you can cause your body to neuro-chemically memorize or instruct the subconscious part of the mind. And replacing the old mind with new rational concepts leaves us in a better position than we started.
What is important for the irrational (materialist or spiritualist) person is to learn how to think rationally first and only then supra-rationally, because cognitive biases and illusions hinder decisions and judgment (just look at how I was quickly mistaken for an imaginary sock puppet…).
One of the best ways to refine your decision-making and judgment process is to understand the difference between what is actual and what is a human concept.
Understand the difference between actual and conceptual and you will have a chance to go beyond the limits of the rational (i.e. supra-rational). (3)
(3) More on the limits of rational thought here:
https://actualfreedom.com.au/library/topics/rational.htm
As for the question of “pure consciousness”, since only a living and awake human body possesses it, then there is nothing to add. There is no need to misrepresent my messages by presenting synonyms.
Since I never expected confirmation from others, I decided to investigate with my own resources how to become an actually free man and finally, as expected, this happened last year. I would have liked to have contacted Richard, but that was not possible.
Now, pure intent is no longer necessary because all traces of resistance (objections created by an intellect hijacked by the ego) have been eliminated from this nervous system.
And that is extraordinary for this body and for others around it!
I know that various studies estimate that between 70% and 93% of communication is non-verbal. And so I also understand that many here do not appreciate my writing style. However, it is a matter, once again, of personal opinion, as well as preferences for colors and flavors.
For the record…
My biggest contribution to actualism (not that actualism from analytical philosophy from which Richard borrowed the term), is not the path without resistance.
I regard my most important contribution as the discovery, explanation, and definitions of the actual (exist) and phenomena (events that happen).
There is more than one way to become an actually free man or woman today!
Salud,
PWR
PS: “non-physical phenomena” such as the psychic “vibes” proposed by Richard do not occur… In the case of phenomena between the interaction of two or more concepts, there will still be a living brain and a physical body operating. And as for electromagnetic phenomena that occur without the need for direct contact between bodies and objects, these will still be occurring in the actual world and will continue to occur even when there is no human consciousness (in a living and awake body, of course) to contemplate them.