More great questions. The subject appears to be able to reflect on itself, and become the object. Object on object? Some kind of subject/ object merger? Pure objectivity? The subject and object already appear inextricably linked. It’s difficult to draw the line between where the subject ends and the object begins, and vice versa.
Due in part to the fact that without object there is no subject. The object makes the subject, it makes the experience. The line between the two is arbitrary. So why not say it is all subject then? Or all object then? Pure subjectivity vs pure objectivity? The latter strikes as more correct than the former, but still seems off at the moment. There is just existence and that’s it. Then there is awareness of existence, then awareness of awareness of existence, which is just more existence.